IBJNews

City narrows field of contenders vying to develop Mass Ave parcel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A midrise mix of apartments and first-floor retail is the most likely replacement for a triangle-shaped Mass Ave parcel occupied by the Indianapolis Fire Department.

fire-station-map0402.gifThe city is wrapping up its selection process for redevelopment of the 1.45-acre property bordered by Massachusetts Avenue, North New Jersey Street and East North Street.

Five bidders submitted proposals in November, and industry sources said the city and brokerage firm CB Richard Ellis, which the city hired to shepherd the process, have narrowed the field to three and plan to announce the successful bidder in the next few weeks.

Construction likely won’t begin for at least another year, though, because the city must first move the Indianapolis Fire Department headquarters, Fire Station No. 7 and the Firefighters Credit Union.

Simultaneously with its review of fire station redevelopment plans, CB Richard Ellis is helping the city scout for sites to relocate the fire department operations and to build a much-needed parking garage to serve the Mass Ave corridor and the new project.

Deputy Mayor Michael Huber said the city and CB are juggling multiple components that have to come together for the project to work. He declined to discuss timing or identify the bidders.

“We are excited about the quality of the responses and the ideas that were submitted,” he said.

Market observers expect the redevelopment proposals to range in price from $30 million to $50 million.

Two bidders confirmed submitting proposals, and real estate sources identified two other contenders. IBJ could not determine the fifth bidder by press time.

One of the finalist bidders is a high-powered partnership of apartment specialist J.C. Hart Co., jack-of-all-trades developer Paul Kite Co. and the architecture firm Schmidt Associates.

The team’s proposal calls for four or five stories of apartments over ground-floor commercial space along Mass Ave. Underground parking would serve the residential units above.

The structure would “feel” like Mass Ave, but with a “contemporary bent,” said Schmidt Associates principal Wayne Schmidt. He declined to share renderings or a final cost, citing competitive reasons.

“We feel like we have a good, solid proposal,” said Schmidt, whose 100-person firm has its headquarters at Massachusetts Avenue and Vermont Street. “Our firm has been involved in the Avenue through its entire rebirth. We look at Mass Ave as being our home.”

Flaherty & Collins Properties and Insight Development Corp., another finalist, are proposing a development that would tie in with their $25 million project across the street, which calls for a mix of market-rate and affordable apartments and retail space surrounding Barton Tower.

By developing both sites, the firms could realize some savings on financing and also achieve the “right mix” of retail and housing for that stretch of Mass Ave, Insight Development President Bruce Baird said in a statement.

“Our proposed vision for the firehouse site works in a cohesive fashion with our plans for the Barton side of the street,” Baird said.

“We see a mix of quality housing—all market rate on that side of the street—and a significant retail component that will attract shoppers and merchants and better connect Mass Ave between East and New Jersey streets.”

He declined to provide a project price or describe the proposal in more detail.

Bidders also include a joint effort by Milhaus Development and Shiel Sexton, and an offering by Monument Realty.

It also wasn’t clear which of the bidders besides the teams made up of Flaherty/Insight and Hart/Kite/Schmidt had made the city’s short list.

Principals with Milhaus and Monument Realty did not return phone messages. Officials with Shiel Sexton declined to discuss their bid. Milhaus already is working on a city-supported deal to redevelop the former home of the Bank One Operations Center into apartments.

Two other high-powered local developers, Keystone Group and Buckingham Cos., did not submit bids for the Mass Ave parcel. Keystone won a deal last year to build a parking and retail building for the city in Broad Ripple, and Buckingham is developing the city-supported CityWay project at Delaware and South streets.

In the case of the Mass Ave redevelopment, the city has asked bidders to pay for the site. City incentives likely would come in the form of subsidizing a parking garage or perhaps tax abatements.

The administration of Mayor Greg Ballard is running an unusually quiet selection process, refusing to disclose any information on the bids in response to public records requests, even the names of who is bidding, ostensibly so the city can gain some leverage over the bidders.

Years earlier, former Mayor Bart Peterson revealed detailed information about the bidders seeking to redevelop the Market Square Arena site, an endeavor that ultimately fizzled.

The failure of that project and a handful of other condo developments downtown painted a grim outlook for downtown residential, but a resurgence of apartments has rekindled optimism.

The empty-nester condo buyers never really materialized, but the apartment market—both in terms of occupancy and financing—continues to look strong, said Brian F. Knapp, director of special assets and investment services for the local office of Colliers International.

Knapp, who experienced the condo downturn firsthand when he had to return his Lockerbie Park project to lenders, said he’s less convinced about the prospects for a retail component in the Mass Ave redevelopment.

He’s concerned about the “revolving door” of tenants on the corridor and all the existing vacant spaces.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT