IBJNews

City plans more bike lane construction

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Mayor Greg Ballard on Friday outlined plans for an additional 75 miles of trails and bike lanes to be built throughout the city by 2015.

The plan announced at a press conference is part of Ballard’s citywide connectivity initiative that includes bikeways, greenways and trails. Ballard was joined by community leaders, residents and trail users at Eagle Creek Park for the official opening of the 71st Street Connector Trail.

Ballard said the planned construction will connect with existing infrastructure, neighborhoods, commercial centers and destinations citywide, expanding Indianapolis’ current greenways and bikeways network by nearly two-thirds—and reaching a total of 200 miles by 2015.

The project will be funded by $20 million in RebuildIndy money, part of the proceeds of the city's sale of its water and sewer utilities to Citizens Energy Group.

“The 71st Street Connector Trail is a crucial segment of our long-term plan for a network of greenways, bikeways and trails that will enhance the connectivity of our neighborhoods, our city and even our region,” Ballard said. “The next 75 miles of infrastructure are planned with the same level of strategic connectivity in mind.”

The 0.8-mile-long 71st Street Connector Trail joins up Eagle Creek Park and its extensive trail system with the trail network on nearby Intech Park’s 200-acre grounds.

The Connector, Ballard said, allows pedestrians and cyclists to safely enter Eagle Creek Park from 71st Street and provides access to the nearly completed 13 miles of new bike lanes along Lafayette Road and White River Parkway, linking New York Street downtown to the county line.

Federal stimulus grants provided 85 percent of the funding for the Connector Trail, with the city spending roughly one dollar for every six dollars of grant funding applied, city officials said.

The trail incorporates five boardwalks built above wetlands, and features benches constructed from Indiana limestone.


 


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Waste of Money
    I drive all day in this city. When I come upon these bike lanes I just have to [lace myself in the position of the person on the bike. I ask my self why would I expose myself the this traffic hazard.
    Can't these people in charge of this city find other ways to spend their money.....for example timing of the lights to make driving more efficient.
  • Great
    As a long time Indy bicycle commuter, I am tired of the fact that the administration puts no thought whatsoever into the safety of these bike lanes. Most are extremely poorly designed and make biking more dangerous not less. You don't put a bike lane next to parked cars for example. Most serious bikers eschew the bike lanes in favor of following safety procedures in regular traffic lanes. The bike lanes for the most part are a tremendous waste of money. Why can't the Ballard administration talk to regular bike commuters when making decisions about how these bike lanes are to be designed. Groups like IndyCog do not represent real bike commuters.
  • great use of funds
    I will not use them most likely but i am all for them. Cheaper than the Light rail that i would use, but most importantly it will give riders a place to ride and not in the street. I have seen way too many close calls with motorists who are aggrivated and cyclists. The Cyclist most of the time does have the right of way, but do not seem to care that a 2ton truck will leave nothing but greasey spot on the road.
    Drivers give the cyclists a brake, lets all take our time and get there in one piece.
  • Bike Lanes
    Bike lanes work just fine. Try using them sometime. With any biking situation, you must pay attention to certain issues especially when car/bike conflicts are possible. This includes bike lanes, sharrows, side trails and even greenways. If you are uncomfortable riding in a bike lane....then don't. They are a great investment and I have had the pleasure of witnessing more people riding bikes because of them.
    • Separation of...
      Bike lanes and driving lanes
      May they NEVER meet
      And if our city officials could get this through their thick skulls.....
    • Way to try to buy an election
      Let me start by asserting that I am a bigger proponent of pedestrian and bike infrastructure than most. I fully encourage it and will always push for more of it. My problem here is what it politically represents.

      We are coming up on an election very soon and Ballard is spending tons of money out of his privatization slush fund to make himself look better to progressives. Don't forget that that money will run out and it is supposed to last for DECADES. I love the improvements and gladly accept them but my vote cannot be bought.

      I can't wait for a mayor who is more than mediocre. Our city deserves much better, our city deserves Melina Kennedy.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The lack of street-level retail in this part of the Block 400 development is a huge oversight and somewhat perplexing given the high quality of recent city-backed developments downtown. This portion of an otherwise stellar development is going to have an extremely negative impact on the aesthetics, urban environment, walkability, and livability of the NW quad.

      I'm not sure why One America would oppose including retail. And I find it very hard to believe that the thousands of office workers literally footsteps away wouldn't be able to support new lunchtime destinations and other businesses along Illinois and Vermont. We've got to reconnect the disjointed segments of our blossoming downtown, not create yet another lifeless dead zone that no one wants to walk through. Sadly, that is exactly what this massive ugly single-use structure will accomplish.

      Why not follow the precedent set by the proposed garage in Broad Ripple and create an attractive mixed-use structure? Why does the city get it there but not downtown?

    2. Bear mind that DS is just not another lazy, rich kid. He attended Columbia grad school and was in investment banking for 4 or 5 years before joining his dad's company. An annual grant of stock options at market price would be the correct pay-for-performance program then no one could argue with it.

    3. This comes from an executive who gave his wife a Bentley as a wedding present. He is heir to billions of dollars. He should be working for a dollar a year and stock options only. Seems like a conflict of interest, time to bring in a non-relative as CEO. Haven't met him, but have heard his arrogance is legendary.

    4. If the property is improved, property taxes increase - more revenue. If AUL's employment grows, more income taxes - more revenue. If more people move and/or work downtown, it means more demand for goods and services, more employment, more taxes - more revenue, etc., etc. It's not just the city throwing money at big companies. There's much, much more. Yes, the project has private backing, but apparently not enough to make the deal work and therefore they don't have it covered. And while Marsh is a nice anchor, they are no credit tenant like a Kroger or somebody. And if the police department has a major shortfall, they need to reduce the force. This city has way too many policemen.

    5. It's hard to defend billionaires, but David Simon has created a tremendous amount of value for shareholders since joining the company. He is widely regarded as one of the best CEOs in America. The company is growing and making good strategic decisions. And Indy is fortunate to have SPG HQ'd here. Now, does that merit $120 million (about 15 mil over 8 years or so)? Maybe. But this family and David have truly built a business. Should Zuckerberg be worth $20 bil? Who knows. Hopefully David will be supportive of Hoosier charities like his family has.

    ADVERTISEMENT