IBJNews

City strengthens building-permit process

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Starting Nov. 1, the city of Indianapolis will require that all building plans for Class 1 structures, which include commercial, industrial and multifamily buildings, be reviewed before a building permit is issued.

The pre-permit review could add nearly three weeks to the permitting process, requiring architects, engineers and contractors to allow for the additional time in their project schedules.

Conversely, the change could help prevent time-consuming corrections to a project already under construction.

Permit approval currently is based on the issuing of what’s called a "construction design release" by the state of Indiana and a completed application to the city’s Office of Code Enforcement.

A construction contractor typically can apply for a building permit in Indianapolis and receive it the same day. The new, pre-permit review is expected to take an additional 15 days to 20 days to complete. 

Cameron Smith, a project manager at Indianapolis-based Shiel Sexton Co. Inc., has mixed feelings about the change.

“From a contractor’s perspective, we see it as an additional item on our schedule; it’s increasing our time to complete the job, which we never like,” Smith said. “On the other hand, it’s best to get everything on the table first thing, so the city and state knows what’s going on with the project.”

OCE Director Rick Powers said in a written statement that effective building code enforcement is essential to building safety and to maintaining affordable insurance rates for residents and business owners.
 
“This new process will improve public safety, and it will save the building industry both time and money if corrections are made prior to construction,” he said.

The pre-permit review is the latest in a series of improvements the city has undertaken following a 2003 audit by the New Jersey-based Insurance Services Office Inc. The ISO lowered the city’s grade for building-code effectiveness because it lacked a detailed building code plan review for commercial, industrial and multifamily properties.

The ISO also admonished the city for low inspection rates and the absence of building-inspector training.

Insurance companies use the ISO rating to set insurance premiums.

The city since has more than doubled its number of building inspectors, started a building inspector certification program and increased inspection rates from 30 percent to 95 percent.

The city encourages applicants to include the plan review in their project timelines, submit a completed application according to requirements and submit building plans as early as possible, concurrent with the application for the construction design release they submit to the state.

OCE will hold a workshop on the pre-permit process at 9 a.m. Oct. 20 at its offices at 1200 Madison Ave., Suite 100.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Fees, fees, fees
    Another example of the public sector sticking their noses in the private sector with their hands out. This measure is more expensive and time consuming, not that the city cares. The OCE is desperate to justify their jobs by stringing this thing out.
  • Fees, fees, fees
    Another example of the public sector sticking their noses in the private sector with their hands out. This measure is more expensive and time consuming, not that the city cares. The OCE is desperate to justify their jobs by stringing this thing out.
  • Maybe the OCE should put their name and stamp on the plans as well, and take some of the liability off the professionals, since they are taking such a invasive interest.
  • Do you think this is going to reduce the E&O insurance for design professionals?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT