IBJNews

City strengthens building-permit process

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Starting Nov. 1, the city of Indianapolis will require that all building plans for Class 1 structures, which include commercial, industrial and multifamily buildings, be reviewed before a building permit is issued.

The pre-permit review could add nearly three weeks to the permitting process, requiring architects, engineers and contractors to allow for the additional time in their project schedules.

Conversely, the change could help prevent time-consuming corrections to a project already under construction.

Permit approval currently is based on the issuing of what’s called a "construction design release" by the state of Indiana and a completed application to the city’s Office of Code Enforcement.

A construction contractor typically can apply for a building permit in Indianapolis and receive it the same day. The new, pre-permit review is expected to take an additional 15 days to 20 days to complete. 

Cameron Smith, a project manager at Indianapolis-based Shiel Sexton Co. Inc., has mixed feelings about the change.

“From a contractor’s perspective, we see it as an additional item on our schedule; it’s increasing our time to complete the job, which we never like,” Smith said. “On the other hand, it’s best to get everything on the table first thing, so the city and state knows what’s going on with the project.”

OCE Director Rick Powers said in a written statement that effective building code enforcement is essential to building safety and to maintaining affordable insurance rates for residents and business owners.
 
“This new process will improve public safety, and it will save the building industry both time and money if corrections are made prior to construction,” he said.

The pre-permit review is the latest in a series of improvements the city has undertaken following a 2003 audit by the New Jersey-based Insurance Services Office Inc. The ISO lowered the city’s grade for building-code effectiveness because it lacked a detailed building code plan review for commercial, industrial and multifamily properties.

The ISO also admonished the city for low inspection rates and the absence of building-inspector training.

Insurance companies use the ISO rating to set insurance premiums.

The city since has more than doubled its number of building inspectors, started a building inspector certification program and increased inspection rates from 30 percent to 95 percent.

The city encourages applicants to include the plan review in their project timelines, submit a completed application according to requirements and submit building plans as early as possible, concurrent with the application for the construction design release they submit to the state.

OCE will hold a workshop on the pre-permit process at 9 a.m. Oct. 20 at its offices at 1200 Madison Ave., Suite 100.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Fees, fees, fees
    Another example of the public sector sticking their noses in the private sector with their hands out. This measure is more expensive and time consuming, not that the city cares. The OCE is desperate to justify their jobs by stringing this thing out.
  • Fees, fees, fees
    Another example of the public sector sticking their noses in the private sector with their hands out. This measure is more expensive and time consuming, not that the city cares. The OCE is desperate to justify their jobs by stringing this thing out.
  • Maybe the OCE should put their name and stamp on the plans as well, and take some of the liability off the professionals, since they are taking such a invasive interest.
  • Do you think this is going to reduce the E&O insurance for design professionals?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT