IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: City water utility in over its head

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

As missteps by the city’s water utility threaten to drown local ratepayers with dramatically higher bills, Mayor Greg Ballard’s administration is exploring a complete overhaul of the system. The mayor’s initiative—even though it’s not driven entirely by the water utility’s woes—can’t produce results soon enough.

The city’s purchase of Indianapolis Water Co. in 2002 has clearly backfired due to lack of execution.

A consultant’s report filed along with the Department of Waterworks’ pending request for a whopping 35-percent rate hike says the department was never adequately staffed to responsibly oversee the utility after it was purchased from Merrillville-based NiSource.

When important decisions must be made, the city staff too often defers to consultants, its own volunteer board and Veolia Water, the French firm that was hired to manage the utility, according to the report prepared by a Colorado utility consulting firm hired by the city to assess the utility.

The damning report is part of the case before the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, which must decide whether to grant the utility’s hefty rate increase. The higher rates would pay for $111 million in capital improvements to the city’s water utility infrastructure.

If the rate hike is granted, it will be the second one this year. The IURC earlier approved a 12.3-percent hike to cover more than $25 million in annual debt servicing costs caused by the utility’s overreliance on variable-rate bonds.

The Department of Waterworks already has taken some steps to get its house in order. In March, it hired the former head of enforcement at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management to run the department. Since then, some key positions, including chief financial officer, have changed hands, and there’s a greater emphasis on long-term financial planning.

More drastic changes are in the works.

In an effort to raise cash that could be used to pay for all manner of city infrastructure needs, including a sewer system in need of $2 billion in upgrades, the city is exploring selling the city’s water and sewer utilities outright.

The city’s Infrastructure Advisory Commission is considering proposals from 23 firms that cover a range of options. Among them is a pitch from Citizens Energy, which supplies natural gas here, to pay $1.5 billion for the water and sewer utilities.

The city must carefully consider which of the proposals will maximize the cash that can be generated to fund the city’s considerable infrastructure needs. But equal weight must be given to which proposal would result in responsible stewardship of the city’s water resources.

It’s unlikely the steep rate hike now being considered by the IURC would have been necessary had the utility’s daily operation and long-term capital requirements been handled with sufficient city oversight.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT