Clarian hospital system to adopt IU name

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Clarian Health will change its name to Indiana University Health early next year, the Indianapolis-based hospital system announced Wednesday morning.

Clarian, which will leave intact the names of its oldest hospitals, is betting the IU name carries more punch around Indiana than its own corporate brand. It also hopes to use the IU name to create a national brand, after the model of the Cleveland Clinic or the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

The Clarian name has existed for 14 years as the name of the not-for-profit joint venture formed when the Methodist Church and the IU School of Medicine merged their three Downtown hospitals—Methodist,  Riley Hospital for Children and the IU hospital.

But after a decade of acquisitions and aggressive building, Clarian now operates 16 hospitals around the state. It employs nearly 22,000 workers and has annual revenue of nearly $3.8 billion.

“Obviously, we’ve grown in size dramatically,” said Clarian CEO Dan Evans. But, he added, “The Clarian name and brand was not recognized by customers, referring physicians and others as a statewide academic system.”

Clarian gleaned that insight from surveys and focus groups of 1,400 patients, family members, doctors and staff. Evans said the results clearly showed the IU name meant more than the Clarian name.

“Whatever we lose in brand equity with Clarian,” Evans said, “we more than make up with the IU name.”

Others generally agreed.

Ed Abel, a hospital accountant at Indianapolis-based Blue & Co., said the name change could give Clarian a competitive boost.

“There’s obviously only one medical school in the state. They train a significant number of all the clinicians who practice in the state of Indiana,” he said. “It’s very significant.”

Clarian will retain the name of Methodist and Riley in Indianapolis, Ball Memorial in Muncie, and others. Those hospitals now put the words “A Clarian Health Partner” after their names. So they will likely just change that tagline to “An IU Health Partner,” Evans said.

But newer hospitals, such as the Clarian West Medical Center in Avon, would change to the IU Health West hospital, or something similar, Evans said. A hospital such as Goshen Hospital could change its name to IU Health-Goshen Hospital, he said.

Evans said an uncertain number of Clarian’s 40 different operating brands will go away. The names and other brand materials will be unveiled in the first quarter of 2011.

Jim Walton, president of Indianapolis-based Brand Acceleration, said the overall move makes sense. He also applauds Clarian for keeping the names of historic hospitals.

“That’s smart,” he said. “It carries a lot of weight in the local communities.”

His concern about the name change, however, is more for IU than for Clarian.

“You’re trying to hang two brands on one name. That has the potential to either strengthen both or weaken both,” he said. “I don’t think it necessarily creates confusion about what Indiana University Health is, but it creates confusion about what IU’s focus is [as a school].”

In a statement, IU President Michael McRobbie said, “Indiana University is very proud of its longstanding partnership with the Methodist Church … it is appropriate that the name reflect IU’s strong commitment to the partnership through the IU School of Medicine and IU’s other health science schools, and the vital mission of this partnership throughout the state.”

When Clarian formed on Jan. 1, 1997, the physician staffs of Methodist and IU hospitals fretted and feuded over which would be pre-eminent. But Evans said the new name does not reflect the victory of IU’s medical staff over Methodist’s.

“There are some folks that are uncomfortable being called by the other name. But for the vast majority,” he added, “that’s old stuff now.”


  • fgdg
  • I U Morgue
    As a Purdue grad, I wouldn't want to be caught dead in an IU morgue!
  • Cost???
    How much does it cost to change the name? Has anyone calculated the bottom line number?
  • Don't be fooled
    Don't be fooled--this is just one more step in the IU School of Medicine's ultimate goal to take over all of Clarian. Anyone with knowledge of the inner workings of Clarian knows that the leadership has always favored IU and it's policies. From boards loaded with IU members, to uniforms with IU colors, to medical groups being forced to adopt IU policies, it's been driven by IU's interests. Will it provide better care? That is yet to be seen. It certainly drives revenues. I wonder how the for-profit hospitals in Avon and Carmel will be managed. As long as they end up enriching the University then the leadership will be happy.
  • Bad idea for IU
    Not sure this is a good move for IU. Having their name explicitly attached to all the hospitals currently with the Clarian name could have unintended negative PR consequences. What happens when a hospital in the system experiences a bad PR situation? The IU name will directly be related to the incident. That's why the drug companies distance the association of their corporate brand from the drug product brand in case of a negative incident.

    IU needs to rethink this potential PR nightmare.
  • Of Course!!
    It is about time the Marketing "experts" and the University realize Indiana University and the IU Medical Center carry name recognition and value. I wonder how much money could have been spent on improving medical care and equipment was spent promoting Clarion to a dead-end and now will have to be spent converting Clarion promotion back to IU. What a waste.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

    2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

    3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

    4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

    5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.