College cuts will favor some schools over others

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Commission for Higher Education said state colleges and universities need to find new ways to be efficient—without new tuition hikes—to cope with spending cuts ordered by Gov. Mitch Daniels.

Daniels ordered a $150 million cut in state higher education spending over the remaining 18 months of the state's two-year budget cycle because tax revenues are far below previous projections. The cuts average to about 6 percent of colleges' general fund appropriations and stimulus money that is being used to restore previous general fund cuts.

Individual universities will decide what gets cut, but the commission made recommendations to the governor Tuesday on how much each state school should lose.

The commission rewarded schools that receive lower amounts of state funding per student and those that are making progress toward degree-completion goals. The amount of federal stimulus funds available also factored into the formula for cuts.

Ivy Tech Community College, which has the lowest operating expense per degree according to fiscal year 2008 data, fared the best under the commission's plan, with a 3.49 percent reduction over the two-year budget cycle. Ivy Tech would lose just 0.7 percent this fiscal year, which the school said would allow it to accommodate its record enrollment without layoffs.

Indiana State University would have the highest percentage of cuts, losing 6.64 percent over the two-year budget cycle. Indiana State received more state funding per student in fiscal year 2008 than Purdue University at West Lafayette, Indiana University at Bloomington and most other state schools. Indiana State is also among the schools with the highest operating costs per degree.

Diann McKee, who oversees Indiana State's finances, said the university is already seeking ways to cut spending, including consolidation of administrative functions.

Higher Education Commissioner Teresa Lubbers said it makes sense to make the cuts less painful for schools that do more with less. She expected the governor to accept the recommendation and make cuts starting as early as next month.

"This recommendation attempts to strike a balance between what is equitable with the recognition that a uniform, across-the-board cut for all universities would not be in the best interest of Indiana students or our system as a whole," Lubbers said.

Daniels said the commission's plan was a "thoughtful, fair and tailored" way to divvy up the cuts.

Indiana University would lose about $58 million, or about 5.8 percent, under the commission's plan, while Purdue University would lose about $45 million, or just over 6 percent.

IU President Michael McRobbie said hard decisions will be made in the next few weeks on implementing more cuts while protecting research and instruction.

"No one should underestimate the very serious challenge that this deep cut represents nor the impact it will have on ... IU's broader contributions to the state," McRobbie said Tuesday.

Purdue President France Cordova said her school has been planning for reductions, and is reviewing hiring as well as seeking energy-conservation measures.

The commission said instruction should be schools' top priority, and that they should allocate resources to high-demand programs critical to the state's economy. That could mean cutting low-priority programs, offering more online courses or giving incentives to students who complete degrees with the fewest possible credit hours.

The commission also said schools should seek other long-term efficiencies, such as joint purchasing agreements. But Lubbers said she didn't expect schools to institute new tuition hikes to deal with the cuts.

State tax collections for the first five months of this fiscal year already are $475 million below a May forecast, which lawmakers used in planning the current budget. A new forecast issued this month predicted the state will take in $1.8 billion less through July 2011 than previously projected.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.