IBJNews

TV ratings for Pacers on the upswing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Through the first four games of the season, television ratings for the Indiana Pacers on the Fox Sports Indiana cable channel are up more than 10 percent.

The season opener at San Antonio Oct. 27 earned a 2.7 rating in Indianapolis according to Nielsen Media Research, up 11 percent over last year’s season opener at Atlanta (2.45) and up 26 percent over the 2008-09 opener at Detroit (2.2).

The Pacers' home opener on Oct. 30 against Philadelphia earned a 3.3 household rating, up 19 percent from last year.

Each rating point equals 10,720 central Indiana households, meaning 35,400 households tuned in to the home opener.

Fox officials pointed out that this year’s home opener went head-to-head with the third game of the Major League Baseball World Series and plenty of college football, whereas last year’s was played on a Friday night and did not. The Pacers' season opener went head-to-head with Game 1 of the World Series.

David Morton, president of local marketing firm Sunrise Sports Group, said he isn’t surprised by the early ratings increase.

“Central Indiana is hungry for the Pacers to do well,” he said. “There’s no shortage of Pacers fans here and they’ve been waiting for something to cheer about. Now, with the acquisition of Darren Collison, the emergence of Roy Hibbert and Danny Granger’s involvement with the U.S. team in the world championships, they have something to be excited about.”

Though it's early in the 82-game season, Fox General Manager Jack Donovon thinks the early numbers are an encouraging sign and an indication of things to come.

“As we’ve seen, the Pacers will play an exciting style of basketball,” Donovon said in a prepared statement. “And having every Fox Sports Indiana telecast in [high-definition] this season may bring more viewers to Pacers basketball.”

Fox Sports will air 72 of the team’s 82 regular-season home games. This is the first season all of them will be available in high-definition.

“This high-definition announcement marks a major milestone for Fox Sports Indiana,” Donovan said. “HD telecasts are especially effective in showcasing the athleticism and excitement of NBA basketball.”

A dispute between Fox and Dish Network officials threatened to ding Fox’s ratings. When the two sides couldn’t agree on a financial arrangement, Dish pulled 19 regional Fox Sports cable channels from its lineup Oct. 1. A settlement was reached Oct. 29, and Fox Sports can now be seen in the homes of 100,000 Dish TV subscribers statewide.

The National Basketball Association's TV ratings as a whole are on the rise this year. Sports marketers credit some of the ratings boost to an increasing level of player involvement in social media such as Twitter and Facebook.

In addition, the high-profile moves of LeBron James and Chris Bosh to the Miami Heat to team up with Dwayne Wade, Shaquille O’Neal’s acquisition by the Boston Celtics, and the Los Angeles Lakers' attempt at winning three straight titles has ratcheted up interest.

TNT's exclusive doubleheader coverage of NBA opening night, which included a Miami-Boston matchup, delivered record-setting ratings and audience share for the cable network, with more than 4 million households tuning in.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

ADVERTISEMENT