IBJNews

Council advances utilities transfer proposal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

City-County Council members voted 19-10 Monday night to approve Republican Mayor Greg Ballard’s $1.9 billion plan to transfer Indianapolis’ water and sewer utilities to Citizens Energy Group.

The measure still needs the blessing of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, which could take months.

Council members voted largely along party lines in advancing the proposal, which Ballard says will generate $425 million in cash that the city can use for projects such as street and bridge improvements and vacant home demolitions. Citizens also will take over about $1.5 billion in debt obligations. The mayor announced the deal in March.

In a prepared statement, Council President Ryan Vaughn described the vote as "the most significant step forward for the city since the passage of UniGov."

Citizens, a not-for-profit trust that provides gas, steam and chilled water service to residents in Marion County, says combining the utilities under its umbrella will provide a number of efficiencies and keep rates lower than if the utilities remained in city hands.

Opponents have questioned the wisdom of handing over control of city utilities. They also have been skeptical that rates would be lower under a different ownership structure.

Democratic council minority leader Joanne Sanders argued Monday night that the deal gives Citizens too much freedom to sell water company property and doesn't provide enough public accountability.

The city acquired the water utility in 2002 from Merrillville-based NiSource. Indianapolis Water is managed by Veolia, a private firm that would continue to be tapped to help run the utility under Citizens, the city’s gas utility. The extent of that partnership has not yet been specified.

Currently, the water utility has a 33-percent rate hike request pending before the IURC. Citing questionable oversight by the city’s waterworks board and other problems with the water utility, the state’s Office of Utility Consumer Counselor says Indianapolis Water’s rate request should be limited to 17 percent.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Half of these comments make no sense really; Carmel (rolls eyes; everyone has this high regard but honestly I think people in Carmel are blind) IUPUI- shouldn't receive any accolades for parking garages (location and design wise) Indianapolis with a deteriorating circle center mall doesn't need another complex with the hope of retailers to come, we don't need twenty more CVS's and Starbucks'; I can fly to New York City and find a couple dead blocks; they exist so what...Indianapolis needs an actual downtown population to achieve more...that 120 million pay raise Mr Simon wants; maybe he should re-invest it in downtown Indianapolis..he is sure investing the company funds in Boston...

  2. Zionsville/Eagle Creek is a lovely area however there is one thing that it is severely lacking and that is mountain bike trails. The east side of the city has two wonderful trails available (Ft. Ben and Town Run) and both of these areas are undoubtedly better because of these two trails. Not only do these trails give these parks even more use (more money for the parks) but the people that use these trails are helping to preserve the park through trash pick-up, trail maintenance, and public education. Eagle Creek, it's time to catch up!

  3. DRT...

    Sorry for the confusion and poor wording on my part. There's no official indication that One America opposes retail.

    I was expressing my difficulty in imagining a reason for One America to oppose a more attractive mixed-use structure.

  4. this is an easy one, gambling casinos in all large hotels in the state. Invite in Donald Trump and all the casino owners from Las Vegas. Also, legalize the Indian tribes in Indiana to open casinos tax free. Rivers are a natural for this, the Wabash, the Tippecanoe, and the Ohio Rivers as gambling highways and Lake Michigan from Gary, Indiana. If this is an industry, which it is not, because it makes nothing, it redistributes wealth, instate and out of state. Maybe casinos attached to all shopping malls, Greenwood, Castleton, Keystone at the Crossing.

  5. The state can solve this easily, riverboat gambling in the Ohio River Indiana side, also, Indianapolis converts Union Station to a casino, that way central Indiana residents will not leave the state to gamble. Also, riverboat gambling in Gary , Indiana, Terre Haute, and all along the Wabash River from Lafayette to Terre Haute, to Vincennes. Riverboat tours and vacations as well.

ADVERTISEMENT