IBJNews

Court OKs EnerDel parent's bankruptcy plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A court has approved Ener1's plan to emerge from bankruptcy, the parent company of locally based EnerDel announced Wednesday.

The New York-based electric-car power company, which filed for Chapter 11 protection late last month, expects to come out of the court reorganization by mid-March.

Under Ener1's plan, it will secure up to $86 million in new equity funding and restructure its long-term debt. In addition to the added funding, Ener1 said some creditors have also agreed to restructure their debt in a partial debt-for-equity exchange.

All of the current common stock will be cancelled when the plan becomes effective — expected in the next two weeks. New common and preferred stock will be issued.

The company has been hurt by heavy competition from other countries, especially China.

Ener1 Inc. was the third company to seek bankruptcy protection after receiving assistance from the Energy Department under the economic stimulus law.

Ener1 subsidiary EnerDel received a $118 million stimulus grant from the Energy Department in 2009. California solar panel maker Solyndra Inc. and Beacon Power, a Massachusetts energy-storage firm, declared bankruptcy last year. Solyndra received a $528 million federal loan, while Beacon Power got a $43 million loan guarantee.

At one time, Ener1 leaders said they planned to have 1,400 employees working in Indianapolis-area operations before 2015, but local employment slipped from about 380 in March 2011 to roughly 250 by November. The company dismantled its management team late last year after several setbacks.

EnerDel operates from a Hague Road headquarters, a facility in Noblesville and leased factory space in the Mount Comfort area of Hancock County.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Governments do lose
    For every 250,000 companies created each year, less than 1% are still in business after five years. Normally, venture capital funds new startups, based on technological or market growth potential, and venture capital managers monitor their investments. When governments; local, state, and federal decide to play in the venture capital world of risk investment, the failures stand out like a sore thumb. In the 60's, firms that supplied NASA for the Space Program, were able to obtain government infusion for the startup process. Many of those small firms failed, not because the technology was weak, but due to weak management which was not prepared to manage a fast growing business. While I understand the need to create green energy products and services, it is hard to understand why government needs to get involved in the loan and support process. Rarely do you find the founders of a great startup being retained long term, because the folks who start companies might be able to get a great idea off the ground, however those same founders have little understanding when it comes to managing a $500 Million infusion from government. If the federal government wants to create jobs, give the money to first tier venture capital firms, or invest in larger companies such as the auto industry. While many people disagree with that move, the management structure was in place to get those firms back on track, which saved over a million jobs, and created several thousand new jobs.
  • Question
    How much money is the federal, state, & local governments lose in this bankruptcy?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT