IBJNews

EnerDel parent dismantles executive team

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Ener1 Inc., the struggling parent company of Indianapolis-based advanced-battery maker EnerDel, continued its tumultuous year by completely overhauling its executive management team this week.

The New York-based company said it named a new CEO, president and chief financial officer on Monday in an effort to “improve its performance and shift its business toward heavy-duty transportation and electric grid energy-storage applications.”

Ener1’s initial focus was making compact, lithium-ion-powered batteries for automobiles, but the company has run into deep financial trouble despite receiving more than $100 million in government energy grants and numerous other government incentives.

Ener1 leaders said they planned to have 1,400 employees working in Indianapolis-area operations before 2015, but local employment has slipped from about 380 to roughly 250 since March. EnerDel operates from a Hague Road headquarters, a facility in Noblesville and leased factory space in the Mount Comfort area of Hancock County.

The company said Alex Sorokin has joined Ener1 as interim CEO, replacing Chris Cowger, who took the position less than two months ago.

Cowger was hired as CEO of the EnerDel unit in April and he replaced Ener1 CEO Charles Gassenheimer in September after Gassenheimer was fired. Cowger also was Ener1’s president.

Sorokin, Ener1 said, “brings nearly 30 years of experience successfully leading companies through periods of transition and transformation.” He assisted more than 30 U.S. and international companies “in restructuring and improving their businesses” in a range of industries, including technology, transportation and heavy manufacturing, the company said.

Nicholas Brunero, Ener1’s general counsel since 2008, was given the additional role of interim president.

Dale Parker, chairman of the board of Minnesota-based HickoryTech Corp., was hired as CFO, replacing Jeffrey Seidel, who took the job in September.

Ener1 said Cowger and Seidel resigned from the company but will take consulting roles to “ensure a smooth transition.”

Late last month, Ener1 was removed from the NASDAQ stock exchange due to non-compliance with filing requirements.

Ener1’s shares tumbled from more than $4 a share in January, when Vice President Joe Biden visited EnerDel’s Greenfield battery plant, to less than a dollar in a matter of months. Shares traded at less than 20 cents before it left the NASDAQ exchange.

The company has experienced a series of setbacks this year. Most recently, several lawsuits were filed, claiming the company misled investors about its financial condition.

Investors began filing the suits in August, days after Ener1 said it would restate earnings for 2010 and for the first quarter of this year. Ener1’s 2010 financial loss of $69 million eventually was restated to a loss of $165 million.

Ener1’s auditors said in an August SEC filing that there were growing cash-flow concerns regarding the company and doubts about its ability to continue operations.

EnerDel was formed in Indiana in 2004 when Ener1 began acquiring the lithiom-ion battery operations of Delphi Corp.

It previously received a $118.5 million U.S. Department of Energy grant and has applied for $290 million in federal loan guarantees.
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Tax money
    Looks like another company that received all those energy grants and incentives is taking us for a ride and about ready to go under.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT