IBJNews

EnerDel parent dismantles executive team

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Ener1 Inc., the struggling parent company of Indianapolis-based advanced-battery maker EnerDel, continued its tumultuous year by completely overhauling its executive management team this week.

The New York-based company said it named a new CEO, president and chief financial officer on Monday in an effort to “improve its performance and shift its business toward heavy-duty transportation and electric grid energy-storage applications.”

Ener1’s initial focus was making compact, lithium-ion-powered batteries for automobiles, but the company has run into deep financial trouble despite receiving more than $100 million in government energy grants and numerous other government incentives.

Ener1 leaders said they planned to have 1,400 employees working in Indianapolis-area operations before 2015, but local employment has slipped from about 380 to roughly 250 since March. EnerDel operates from a Hague Road headquarters, a facility in Noblesville and leased factory space in the Mount Comfort area of Hancock County.

The company said Alex Sorokin has joined Ener1 as interim CEO, replacing Chris Cowger, who took the position less than two months ago.

Cowger was hired as CEO of the EnerDel unit in April and he replaced Ener1 CEO Charles Gassenheimer in September after Gassenheimer was fired. Cowger also was Ener1’s president.

Sorokin, Ener1 said, “brings nearly 30 years of experience successfully leading companies through periods of transition and transformation.” He assisted more than 30 U.S. and international companies “in restructuring and improving their businesses” in a range of industries, including technology, transportation and heavy manufacturing, the company said.

Nicholas Brunero, Ener1’s general counsel since 2008, was given the additional role of interim president.

Dale Parker, chairman of the board of Minnesota-based HickoryTech Corp., was hired as CFO, replacing Jeffrey Seidel, who took the job in September.

Ener1 said Cowger and Seidel resigned from the company but will take consulting roles to “ensure a smooth transition.”

Late last month, Ener1 was removed from the NASDAQ stock exchange due to non-compliance with filing requirements.

Ener1’s shares tumbled from more than $4 a share in January, when Vice President Joe Biden visited EnerDel’s Greenfield battery plant, to less than a dollar in a matter of months. Shares traded at less than 20 cents before it left the NASDAQ exchange.

The company has experienced a series of setbacks this year. Most recently, several lawsuits were filed, claiming the company misled investors about its financial condition.

Investors began filing the suits in August, days after Ener1 said it would restate earnings for 2010 and for the first quarter of this year. Ener1’s 2010 financial loss of $69 million eventually was restated to a loss of $165 million.

Ener1’s auditors said in an August SEC filing that there were growing cash-flow concerns regarding the company and doubts about its ability to continue operations.

EnerDel was formed in Indiana in 2004 when Ener1 began acquiring the lithiom-ion battery operations of Delphi Corp.

It previously received a $118.5 million U.S. Department of Energy grant and has applied for $290 million in federal loan guarantees.
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Tax money
    Looks like another company that received all those energy grants and incentives is taking us for a ride and about ready to go under.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT