IBJNews

Creditor could take ownership of downtown Comfort Suites

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Comfort Suites City Centre on the southwestern fringe of downtown Indianapolis that filed bankruptcy earlier this year could be handed back to its largest creditor.

The owner of the Comfort Suites City Centre, Warsaw Hotel Partners LLC, is an affiliate of Dora Brothers Hospitality Corp. in Fishers. Dora Brothers operates 18 hotels in Indiana under various flags, including 10 in the Indianapolis area.

Warsaw filed for 11 bankruptcy petition in February. Court papers list assets of $6.8 million and liabilities of $12.1 million.

New York-based German American Capital Corp., which alone is owed $12 million, could own the property by the end of the year, if a U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge approves the plan.

In a Tuesday court filing, German American is proposing to take ownership from Warsaw Hotel Partners of the Comfort Suites by submitting a “credit bid” of $7.5 million. A credit bid is a legal maneuver in which a bank uses its debt in a property to acquire it.

German American likely is confident that it can resell the property for more than the bid in an attempt to at least get some return on its investment.

Objections to the proposal are due to the bankruptcy court by Oct. 19, and a hearing has been set for Oct. 24.

“Time is clearly of the essence, since the closing of the sale promptly is of critical importance,” a lawyer for Warsaw Hotel Partners wrote in court documents.

German American provided Warsaw Hotel Partners a $12.6 million loan in February 2007 to acquire land and construct the Comfort Suites. The loan came due in November 2010, at which time Warsaw Hotel Partners still owed $11.2 million in principal, according to court documents.

The Comfort Suites continues to operate, as is customary for hotels seeking to reorganize their debts through Chapter 11.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT