IBJNews

Cummins hires ex-Indianapolis mayoral candidate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Melina Kennedy, a Democrat who lost to Greg Ballard in last year's Indianapolis mayoral election, has joined Cummins Inc. as director of executive communications, a spokeswoman for the Columbus-based company said Wednesday.

As part of the corporate communications team, her duties will include research and speechwriting for CEO Tom Linebarger.

Kennedy will be based at the diesel engine maker’s downtown Indianapolis office in OneAmerica tower.

Her hiring is part of an effort to build the company’s corporate communications team, said Carol Casto, executive director of the department. Mel Raines, a vice president of operations for the Super Bowl Host Committee, also has joined the team.

“We needed to grow it to support what we think will be a $30 billion business in the next couple of years,” Casto said.

The communications department consists of 20 employees and could grow to include 30, she said.

Kennedy, a former environmental law attorney for Johnson Smith LLP, previously served as deputy mayor for economic development under former Indianapolis Mayor Bart Peterson.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Law Firm
    Ms. Kennedy was a partner at Baker & Daniels with a focus in public finance.
  • Politics at finest
    That is true. Casto was politcal flunkee at FSSA and spent millions for her Six Sigma Creditial. She is just helping out friend. Called good ol Girls Club
  • Politics at finest
    That is true. Casto was politcal flunkee at FSSA and spent millions for her Six Sigma Creditial. She is just helping out friend. Called good ol Girls Club
  • Rolodex
    Bet hers is bigger than "most" who struggle to get jobs. It's the combination of what and who you know that matters today.
  • Funny how...
    Politician types get jobs so fast while most struggle to find work. Just an observation.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

    ADVERTISEMENT