Cummins plans wellness center for employees

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana-based Cummins Inc. is planning a company-first wellness center for its employees and their families in Columbus on the Jackson Street block that now contains the Volunteers in Medicine clinic.

The facility, which will be more than a year away in opening, would be the first of its kind for the company. Should the concept prove successful, Cummins will consider similar arrangements in other areas with Cummins plants, said Dr. Dexter Shurney, chief medical officer for Cummins.

Shurney said the clinic is growing out of the company's efforts to improve employees' long-term health, and to make them aware of the cost and quality of their health care. The facility would be used to encourage employees and their families to take advantage of a comprehensive approach to their personal health, he told The Republic.

"We envision this offering a fairly comprehensive spectrum of services," Shurney said. "We would likely be able to treat that cold and sniffle, but also check blood pressure for individuals who have a chronic illness."

The clinic would likely provide services such as nutrition and exercise counseling, and health assessments.

Services would be available to company employees and their families as part of their insurance benefits but would have an associated cost and will not be free, Shurney said.

Some services, such as massage, would be outside of the company's normal benefits package, Shurney said. How those services will be funded still is being determined, he said.

The company decided to test the concept in Columbus because of the large number of employees locally and the tight relationship between the engine maker and Columbus Regional Hospital, Shurney said.

The site is just north of the Cummins headquarters.

The company has bought or is in the process of buying most of the property on the block between Eighth and 11th Streets and Jackson and Lindsey streets.

In July, the company acquired the building at the corner of Jackson and Eighth streets and the building at Brown and Eighth streets, according to county property records.

At Cummins' request, the city in October approved a replatting to combine the properties to the north and west of the Volunteers in Medicine clinic into one parcel, although that property still is owned by Jackson Place LLC, according to city and county records. Cummins is in the process of installing a sidewalk on the northern edge of the property across from the city's roundabout.

The only remaining properties on the block are the Volunteers in Medicine clinic and the Jackson Place apartments themselves. Last month, the city sold the Volunteers in Medicine clinic building and property to the Columbus Regional Health Foundation. Shurney said Cummins is in negotiations to purchase the clinic property.

"We are still in the design phase," he said. "We thought it was best to acquire as much of that property as we could, if we wanted to expand, so we wouldn't be limited, constricted or constrained in space."

Volunteers in Medicine and hospital officials said they want to make sure that before the clinic is sold that it is set up in a new location with the ability to meet its clients' future health care needs.

Shurney said Cummins shares an interest in the clinic's mission.

"We see that as part of our corporate responsibility," Shurney said. "We have a very good relationship with Volunteers in Medicine now, and we also have a very good relationship with Columbus Regional Hospital. We want that to continue."

Cummins likely will contract with a doctor's group to operate the wellness center when it opens, Shurney said.

The timeline still is in development, but the company is hoping for a 2015 opening, said Melina Kennedy, Cummins director of executive communication.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).