IBJNews

Cummins posts lower quarterly profit, revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Cummins Inc. on Wednesday posted lower profit and revenue in the third quarter as demand fell for its engines in nearly all parts of the globe.

The Columbus-based manufacturer of diesel engines reported a 22-percent decline in profit, from $452 million, or $2.35 per share, in the year-ago period to $352 million, or $1.86 per share, in the latest quarter.

Excluding one-time items, Cummins earned $1.78 per share. Analysts at Thomson Reuters had expected earnings of $1.83 per share.

Quarterly revenue fell 11 percent, to $4.1 billion.

The slowdown is prompting Cummins to delay or cancel projects and reduce its work force by 1,000 to 1,500 employees by the end of the year, said Tom Linebarger, the company’s chairman and CEO, in a prepared statement. About 150 of those employment cuts will be in Indiana.

“Demand has dropped sharply over the last three months, reflecting a high degree of uncertainty among customers in most geographic markets,” he said. “We are working to respond to the conditions now to ensure the long-term strength of the company and to best serve the many stakeholders who rely on Cummins for long-term success.”

Sale were disappointing among all parts of the company, dropping 14 percent in the engine segment, 8 percent in the parts segment, and 7 percent in both the power generation and distribution areas.

Cummins lowered its 2012 revenue estimate to $17 billion from $18 billion.

Company shares dipped 1 percent in premarket trading, to $92.65 each.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, let me say that I love the idea of communities being self-sufficient and people in the community not needing cars, living, working and shopping all in their neighborhood. To sum it up; I love good urban planning and hate urban sprawl. However, there are two reasons that I am against this development. First, this building doesn't fit. Density can occur in Ripple by building up top the street and better use of land. The scale of this project should be downtown. Secondly, I would be willing to bet that if a whole foods in Ripple is built, the Nora store would be closed. Here's my reasoning. The Nora Whole Foods expansion plans have been put on hold. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the Ripple proposal. Communities next to each other should work together to end sprawl and not work against each other and take other neighbors assets. Develop something both communities can be proud of and will attract more development and density. There's my soap box for the day.

  2. My apologies, Lou - it was the Indy Star that printed cost for entertaining "celebrities" during Indy 500. Sorry for confusing the always timely IBJ with Indy's Gannett reprint news source.

  3. That's fine if you want a grocery store that has festivals and live music. I guess with the prices they charge, they can afford to host such activities. As for me, I choose to spend my money more wisely and if I want to go to a festival or a concert, I will pay for that separately - not through my grocery bill.

  4. TIF is not just to attract development but to attract a higher use for that development. Carmel wisely is using TIF for numerous public parking garages. Asphalt seas of parking pay little taxes and bring even less value to a commercial area. Also density is what is going to save Indy and Broad Ripple. The days of trying to compete with burbs are long gone.

  5. The Prestige was an awesome movie.

ADVERTISEMENT