IBJNews

Daniels, hopefuls support Indiana corn ethanol

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Democrat and Republican running to replace Gov. Mitch Daniels spent most of their Tuesday morning talk with Indiana corn growers and ethanol producers outlining their similarities, starting with the fact that their campaign vehicles run on E85 ethanol blends.

Former Democratic Indiana House Speaker John Gregg and Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Pence disagreed about little Tuesday at the Indiana Ethanol Forum. Both touted their support for more fuel choices — read that as higher blends of ethanol in gasoline and more gas pumps throughout the state that dispense E85 blends — and blasted the Obama administration for new regulations on coal plants that could hit the state's coal industry.

Gregg said he would consider a state-level ethanol consumption mandate and look at building more E85 fuel pumps around the state. Pence, meanwhile, argued that building out the state's roads would help maximize development of the state's existing ethanol plants.

The forum showed stark similarities between Pence and Gregg as they head into a November election for the governor's office. Daniels is term-limited against seeking re-election. Moving from ethanol both men blasted Obama for efforts to regulate carbon dioxide emissions.

"I think our president's position is wrong on coal," Gregg said. Pence reminded the crowd that he helped lead the charge in Washington against the 2009 House energy bill. He still receives some of his loudest applause at campaign stops when he blasts Democratic efforts to impose an "energy tax" via limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

Both Pence and Gregg have dribbled out specific policies they would push if they win office, while saying they plan to roll out grander plans with specific ideas in the near future.

Gregg said the state needs to find money to repair Indiana's crumbling infrastructure, as money from the leasing of the Indiana Toll Road runs out and the gas tax becomes a less reliable source of funding. However, he says he wants to wait before outlining how he would pay for a new roads plan.

Pence, meanwhile, said he is looking at pushing more public-private partnerships, or P3s, as a way to pay for road improvements.

"I think using some of the new tools that we have from the General Assembly — so-called P3 proposals, where we allow user fees, where there's public support for that to occur and we can build infrastructure — I think are all part and parcel of how we take Indiana to the next level," Pence said.

Roz Leeck, biofuels director for the Indiana Corn Marketing Council said 30 percent of the state's corn was converted to ethanol last year. He noted that Indiana provides roughly 7 percent of the nation's ethanol.

While state-level decisions have helped shape the industry that boomed in the Midwest through the last decade, much of the battle is still being fought in Washington.

Asked about what the federal government could do to support Indiana's ethanol industry, Daniels told the crowd he wants an end to "hostility" against corn ethanol in Washington. Lawmakers recently allowed to expire a $5.4 billion dollar a year tax credit that paid oil refiners 45 cents per gallon to add ethanol to their mixes.

"I guess the point is it would matter more what they would stop doing rather than what we would ask them to do: the rather sudden hostility that manifests itself in all kinds of ways," Daniels said.

Environmentalists and oil refiners have formed a tenuous political union on the issue blaming the federal padding for corn ethanol for driving up food prices and increasing greenhouse gas emissions via the process used to create the fuel.

But the ethanol industry is still on sure footing in Washington: The Environmental Protection Agency recently approved a higher blend of ethanol in gasoline and a 2007 federal law requires that the nation consume 36 billion gallons of ethanol a year by 2022.

Ethanol supporters, including Daniels, Gregg and Pence, have made the argument that as the price of oil increases, alternative fuels become more economical. Other supporters, such as Bob Dineen, president of the Renewable Fuels Association, credit the 36-billion gallon mandate with cutting foreign oil imports dramatically since it was first adopted in 2005.

"It has helped to save consumers money by ensuring these domestic fuels will be in the market," he said shortly before Gregg took the stage. "Moreover, from an energy security standpoint, this program has been an unmitigated success."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Fraudelent Argument
    Harold Wilson, you've got it right. Corn ethanol is the biggest energy scam ever foised on the American public. Not only does the mileage pale compared to gasoline, but it's expensive to produce and drives up food prices. Never fear though as the agricultural lobby will continue to ram it down our throuts.

    Ethanol can be cost efficient and not disrupt food production when it is made from sugar cane. Problem is that there's alot less sugar cane in this country than corn, but we could still import it or grow more and come out ahead. All this is election year pandering.
  • The issue is more complex than ethanol
    Having been involved in the alternative fuels arena for about 6 years now, I will grant that the story of alternatives for liquid fuel replacement is by far the most difficult story anyone could attempt to tell. The real question is what can we do,(absolutely inclusive of ethanol as part of the mix), to insure domestic energy security and get the U. S. out of some of the scariest, most volatile places on earth. The consuming public has unknowingly relinquished control of our fuel supply in manners that can ultimately jeopardize the American way of life.
    Ethanol has provided a viable bridge towards alleviating the wicked problems liquid fuel consumers now face. The ethanol story is an evolving one, dated generalizations about this viable fuel source will not solve the bigger problems.
  • Corn Ethanol Scam
    Corn ethanol hurts the average person through lower gas mileage and higher food prices. The only people who benefit are rich farmers. The average person gets stuck with a higher grocery bill. Corn ethanol is also extremely environmentally destructive, as farmers in my area are dumping HUGE amounts of pesticide, fungicide and fertilizer on corn on corn rotations which are causing increased runoff. The only reason that corn ethanol exists is to buy off farm state votes in the Purdue Ag crowd. We need some real leadership to tell these rich farmers, Purdue and the ag lobby where to go with respect to this inferior fuel!
  • political hogwash
    If I'm reading this correctly, Republicans, after decades of arguing against subsidy and regulation, want government to up the subsidy and regulation? I suppose this is where the classic republican/tea party nuts insert the comment "if it was such a great deal, private business would take over". I guess pouring the state's future into road construction and fuel for cars isn't what private business wants....at least in free market conditions. Do we plan to cintinue our subsidy for oil production and businesses as well as increase subsidies for ethanol?

    I would love an intelligent discussion on the matter, unfortunately our "representatives" can't offer such a forum.
  • corn scam
    Corn ethanol is one of the biggest scams ever played on the taxpayer.
  • Rediculous
    Will these fools refuse to realize there is something called Global Warming?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
ADVERTISEMENT