IBJNews

Daniels' plan on sentencing changes appears dead

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A plan pushed by Gov. Mitch Daniels aimed at reducing Indiana's prison crowding by easing penalties for low-level offenders appears dead in the Legislature after running into stiff opposition from county prosecutors.

Daniels, a Republican, had made revamping of the criminal sentencing laws one of his top priorities for this year's legislative session, but lawmakers handling the bill said Tuesday they hadn't been able to reach a compromise and didn't expect more action before the General Assembly's April 29 adjournment deadline.

Senate Corrections Committee Chairman Brent Steele, R-Bedford, said that opposition from prosecutors, police chiefs and sheriffs doomed the proposal from Daniels.

"Without those groups buying into it, it wasn't going to pass," Steele said. "That's the political reality."

Daniels had threatened to veto the bill after the Senate added provisions to require those convicted of the most serious crimes to serve at least 85 percent of the sentence ordered by a judge. The governor said he was concerned about increased costs from changing current law that allows most inmates to be released after serving half their sentence if they don't get into trouble while in prison.

Daniels spokeswoman Jane Jankowski said the original plan "was very well thought out and researched" but dealt mainly with low-level offenders, and once lawmakers broadened that concept, more research was needed to gauge the financial impact.

"Ultimately, the decision has been made that it's more important to get it right," she said. "We've got to get those numbers right so we can fold it all together and come back next year with a more comprehensive approach."

The bill — based on recommendations from the Pew Center on the States and the Council of State Governments Justice Center — originally envisioned reducing the time many low-level offenders like thieves and drug dealers would spend in prison and shifting many into alternative programs like probation. State officials estimated it could save $1.2 billion in new prison construction over the next seven years.

But prosecutors said the bill was too soft on crime, and pushed for the tougher sentencing provisions approved by the Senate.

Ohio-Dearborn County Prosecutor Aaron Negangard, chairman of the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council, said he was glad the sentencing changes would be considered by a state commission conducting a full review of the criminal laws.

"We were in favor of the more balanced approach that came out of the Senate but thought the bill still had a lot more work that needed to be done with it," Negangard said.

Bill sponsor Rep. Ralph Foley, R-Martinsville, had tried to reach a compromise on the plan, but gave up that effort without a House committee even taking a vote.

He said he hoped the criminal code review commission could come up with an acceptable plan for legislators to consider next year.

"Taxpayers aren't in favor of building new prisons and raising taxes for them — even if they are in favor of throwing prisoners in jail and throwing the key away," Foley said.

The failure to reach agreement on a plan disappointed Larry Landis, executive director of the Indiana Public Defenders Council.

"It means prison growth will continue unabated, spiraling costs which means down the road we have to build more prisons," Landis said. "If we do, that means either a tax increase or you have to significantly cut other services the state provides."

Steele, the Senate committee chairman, said he hoped more time studying possible sentencing changes would give lawmakers better information on the impact to prison population and costs to the state.

"What we've gotten so far has just been pitiful as far as getting a clear picture of where we stand," Steele said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Who monitors the probies?
    I'm just curious... how many new probation officers is Daniels going to hire to monitor all the new probationed criminals? This to me is short-term effect that creates a long-term problem. I hope the next round of suggestions is a little bit more insightful.
  • drugs
    doesn't he have charges that he needs dropped from his college days?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

  2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

  3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

  4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

  5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?

ADVERTISEMENT