IBJNews

Daniels unsure of lobbying role as Purdue president

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Gov. Mitch Daniels' legal staff is trying to determine whether he can lobby state lawmakers when he takes over as president of Purdue University.

Daniels said Friday he wasn't sure whether he could press members of the General Assembly on the university's behalf because state ethics rules require a one-year "cool down" for public officials after leaving office. If the law is unclear, he said he would "lean" against lobbying in his first year at Purdue.

"If anything, I'm going to lean on the side of extra caution. If that means someone else tells the story down here tells the story for at least a year, that's what it means," Daniels said, motioning to Indianapolis.

Daniels was named Purdue's president Thursday and will start at the university in January.

The upcoming legislative session will be critical for university leaders as lawmakers craft the state's next two-year budget. Indiana's public universities have struggled with state funding cuts and rising tuition costs. Since 2009, Daniels has ordered more than $150 million in cuts to public education—about $30 million to Purdue.

But there likely will be more money to dole out to cash-starved programs next year. The state's collection of taxes has improved, Daniels amassed a cash savings of roughly $1.8 billion, and a massive error in collecting corporate income taxes resulted in roughly $100 million more annually becoming available to the state.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Wait a minute...
    I work for a state-funded institution of higher learning (not Purdue). None of us is permitted to lobby the state legislature. It is strictly forbidden. I can't believe this is even being discussed.
  • Stop All Lobbying
    There is a simple solution to the issue of lobbying at state and federal levels. Pass a law that bans all lobbying, period. Billions of dollars are spend annually, dumping money into the pockets of elected officials, in an attempt to push legislation that impacts our taxes. Where will it stop? However, set my opinion aside and answer this question; "How can state tax dollars be used to pay the salary of the president of a state funded school, and allow lobbying by that school's president? Can anyone else see the conflict of interest in this matter?
  • Quid pro Quo
    Mitch Daniels se;ection as the next president is the most blatant example of a quid pro quo deal I have ever seen. It is disgraceful. Neither the Board of Trustees at Purdue or Mitch Daniels have any integrity.
  • Come on My Man
    The rules do not apply to Mitch. He decides what is a conflict of interest and what is not. Any body else would not be allowed to take a position directly from state government to a position like this. How can there be any questiion of Mitch and lobbying. I think he should go to Angie's list where has already funded his position.
  • Nepotism
    I don't know if Daniels is related to anyone on the board at Purdue, but he is definitely their sugar daddy. I think that qualifies as Nepotism and Daniels should take a page from Indiana's new nepotism law he so vehemently defended.
  • Vote of No Confidence Vote Approaching
    Undeniable conflict of interest and clear violation of all ethics rules. The public and University community are smarter that he thinks.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT