IBJNews

Daniels unsure of lobbying role as Purdue president

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Gov. Mitch Daniels' legal staff is trying to determine whether he can lobby state lawmakers when he takes over as president of Purdue University.

Daniels said Friday he wasn't sure whether he could press members of the General Assembly on the university's behalf because state ethics rules require a one-year "cool down" for public officials after leaving office. If the law is unclear, he said he would "lean" against lobbying in his first year at Purdue.

"If anything, I'm going to lean on the side of extra caution. If that means someone else tells the story down here tells the story for at least a year, that's what it means," Daniels said, motioning to Indianapolis.

Daniels was named Purdue's president Thursday and will start at the university in January.

The upcoming legislative session will be critical for university leaders as lawmakers craft the state's next two-year budget. Indiana's public universities have struggled with state funding cuts and rising tuition costs. Since 2009, Daniels has ordered more than $150 million in cuts to public education—about $30 million to Purdue.

But there likely will be more money to dole out to cash-starved programs next year. The state's collection of taxes has improved, Daniels amassed a cash savings of roughly $1.8 billion, and a massive error in collecting corporate income taxes resulted in roughly $100 million more annually becoming available to the state.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Wait a minute...
    I work for a state-funded institution of higher learning (not Purdue). None of us is permitted to lobby the state legislature. It is strictly forbidden. I can't believe this is even being discussed.
  • Stop All Lobbying
    There is a simple solution to the issue of lobbying at state and federal levels. Pass a law that bans all lobbying, period. Billions of dollars are spend annually, dumping money into the pockets of elected officials, in an attempt to push legislation that impacts our taxes. Where will it stop? However, set my opinion aside and answer this question; "How can state tax dollars be used to pay the salary of the president of a state funded school, and allow lobbying by that school's president? Can anyone else see the conflict of interest in this matter?
  • Quid pro Quo
    Mitch Daniels se;ection as the next president is the most blatant example of a quid pro quo deal I have ever seen. It is disgraceful. Neither the Board of Trustees at Purdue or Mitch Daniels have any integrity.
  • Come on My Man
    The rules do not apply to Mitch. He decides what is a conflict of interest and what is not. Any body else would not be allowed to take a position directly from state government to a position like this. How can there be any questiion of Mitch and lobbying. I think he should go to Angie's list where has already funded his position.
  • Nepotism
    I don't know if Daniels is related to anyone on the board at Purdue, but he is definitely their sugar daddy. I think that qualifies as Nepotism and Daniels should take a page from Indiana's new nepotism law he so vehemently defended.
  • Vote of No Confidence Vote Approaching
    Undeniable conflict of interest and clear violation of all ethics rules. The public and University community are smarter that he thinks.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT