IBJNews

Delaware County regroups after green factories fizzle

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A central Indiana county is pulling back its financial support for a pair of green-energy companies who so far haven't delivered on plans for factories with hundreds of workers.

The Delaware County commissioners on Monday approved withdrawing $5 million of property-tax support for Italian company Brevini Wind, which in 2009 announced plans for a 455-worker factory outside Muncie that would make wind-turbine gearboxes.

Brevini now has about 70 workers in Yorktown and will still receive $1.7 million in tax-increment financing revenue, The Star Press of Muncie reported.

In its 2009 announcement, Brevini said it would spend $60 million on the project after relocating its U.S. offices from the Chicago suburb of Vernon Hills. The new jobs were supposed to pay an average of $46,000 each.

Delaware County officials also agreed to let the other company, VAT Energies LLC, sell some unused wind-and-solar-powered streetlights that it expected to build in Muncie. The county hopes to recoup $250,000 it paid for a wind vane planned along Interstate 69 that was meant to brand Delaware County as a green manufacturing hub. It was never erected.

VAT Energies, a subsidiary of a German alternative energy company, said in 2009 that it planned to spend $3.3 million to open a 60,000-square-foot facility near Yorktown with up to 120 workers by 2011. 

"It's a hard lesson learned," county Commissioner Larry Bledsoe said about the agreements. "This is the best that it gets, unfortunately."

Commissioners President Todd Donati acknowledged that the agreement with VAT meant that the 100-plus jobs promised by German businessman Oliver Viehweider would never materialize.

Donati said the county would "get what we can, up to $300,000," from the sale of the unused VAT streetlights and save thousands of dollars from a potential legal battle.

"At least we get the $300,000, and we can move on," Donati said.

Brevini Wind has struggled to land projects in the troubled wind-energy industry. Company officials hope to win contracts in other businesses in an effort to employ 250 people by the end of 2013 under an extension of the company's job-creation incentives with the county.

Bledsoe said that VAT's failure was an unfortunate outcome of the pressure on communities to add jobs, especially in the wake of the recession.

"It's the result of very aggressive competition among local communities trying to get economic development," Bledsoe said. "You offer the best incentive you can. Unfortunately, some things don't work out."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT