Democrats outline legislative plans for General Assembly

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Senate Democrats will push for work-share legislation as well as consumer and job protections when the General Assembly reconvenes in January.

Democrats—who hold just 13 of the chamber’s 50 seats—on Tuesday released their 2012 legislative agenda, which Minority Leader Vi Simpson, D-Ellettsville, said is aimed at “helping turn this economy around.”

“Our No. 1 priority—which should be the No. 1 priority of everyone in the state—is jobs, job creation and economic fairness,” Simpson said.

Democrats will push for work-share, an unemployment insurance program that allows a business to reduce staff hours while the state gives workers a share of the unemployment payments they would have received had they been completely laid off. The goal of the program is to keep Hoosiers employed during slow economic times, Democrats said.

More than 20 other states already participate in work-share programs. Senate Democrats plan to support the House bill expected to be authored by Rep. Mary Ann Sullivan, D-Indianapolis, on this issue.

Other Senate Democratic proposals include:

— A bill to require online retailers to collect state sales taxes on purchases. Currently, many online retailers—those without a physical presence in the state—do not collect the tax, which Democrats say gives them an unfair advantage over local businesses.

— Legislation to restrict how an employer can use an applicant’s credit history in hiring. Exceptions would include managerial positions and positions with the state attorney general, local government, law enforcement, or those where credit history consideration is required by federal law.

— A proposal to ban companies from discriminating against people who have been unemployed for long periods. Similar legislation passed in New Jersey and is pending in New York.

— Creation of “new hire” tax credits for small companies, similar to those available to larger firms.

— A plan to give preference for state contracts to companies that employ Hoosiers.

The Democrat plan also includes proposals for early-education programs and additional oversight for private schools that receive vouchers.

“The earlier you start to put children into an educational environment, the better chances they have achieving in school,” said Sen. Earline Rogers, D-Gary. “My legislation would create an office of Early Learning for Children, working in conjunction with the Department of Education, so that we can begin to look at this very important time in the life of a child.”

Republicans who control the Senate have not released a full agenda. But Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, has said that passing right-to-work legislation—which would free all workers from being forced to pay fees to unions they don’t join—is a top priority.

Long has also said that another priority for the 2012 session will be passing a law that clarifies how or whether homeowners can use physical force to bar illegal police entries. The issue stems from a controversial Indiana Supreme Court decision earlier this year.


  • Proposals
    I am not a democrat, but some of the proposals outlined do not seem too bad. I would be firmly against any early education program if it means creating an Office of Early Learning for Children, as proposed by Sen. Rogers.

    Another government agency? Forget it. Let the existing Dept. of Education handle it, and with its existing staff. We in the private sector learned to do more with less years ago.
  • Missing Priorities
    How can mass transportation not be a top priority. It has a huge impact on jobs, economic development, healthcare, development and education among others. We can't keep pushing it aside and wondering why we continue to decline! This must be a top priority for the state, but especially Indianapolis!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?