IBJNews

Developer buying Fountain Square building; museum lined up as tenant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Architect and developer Craig Von Deylen said he hopes to close next week on the purchase of the Murphy Arts Center in Fountain Square. In the meantime, he's lining up new tenants, including the Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art.

Museum board Chairman Brandon Judkins said iMOCA will execute a lease for 2,000 square feet at the Murphy building, 1043 Virginia Ave., today or Monday. "It's a great move for us; it's a great move for the neighborhood," he said.

iMOCA will leave its current home at 340 N. Senate Ave. in time to open a new show at the Murphy building on Dec. 4 as part of the First Friday gallery walk, Judkins said.

The Murphy building is a 44,000-square-foot former five-and-dime store that houses two dozen or more artists' studios on the second floor. Von Deylen has anticipated the purchase from artists and businessmen Philip Campbell and Ed Funk since September. Von Deylen took over management at that time.

Von Deylen would not disclose the purchase price. He said that he's still trying to wrap up financing. 

The Murphy building's transformation into an artists' haven sparked renewed interest in Fountain Square in the late 1990s. Campbell and Funk bought the building from the not-for-profit Southeast Neighborhood Development for $413,000 in June 2001. Campbell and Funk could not be reached for comment.

Other retail tenants may soon fill the Murphy. A British-style pub called the Red Lion hopes to open by mid-month in a space formerly occupied by Gusto, a pizza restaurant. Von Deylen's wife, Jennifer Rice Von Deylen, opened the shop IndySwank in November. Von Deylen is also talking with two nightclub owners.

iMoCA decided to move to the Murphy building because it's already a destination for art-seekers, Judkins said.

The museum almost ran aground earlier this year. Executive Director Kathy Nagler left for a high-level fund-raising job at the Indianapolis Museum of Art. Running out of money to pay salaries, the museum fired curator Christopher West and brought co-founder Jeremy Efroymson aboard to take Nagler's place. Efroymson is working for free.

The museum's current galleries on Senate Avenue are donated by the law firm Katz & Korin. Judkins said he thinks the museum can afford to take on the expense of a lease. He said the museum's finances have stabilized, and the rate Von Deylen is charging is "a reasonable-enough sum."

Moving to Fountain Square may also open doors to new sources of fund raising because iMOCA would play a role in reviving Fountain Square, he said.

iMoCA hopes to make its permanent home in another Von Deylen project, a $9-million, mixed-use development in nearby Fletcher Place. Von Deylen hopes to break ground on the project next year but has not lined up financing. 

Von Deylen would build 56 mostly one-bedroom apartments with ground-floor retail or offices at Virgina Avenue and McCarty Street. He also has agreed to allow iMOCA to occupy a 6,000 square-foot space on the second floor for free and is now calling the project the "iMOCA Building." The museum signed a letter of intent to occupy the space.

Von Deylen hopes to capitalize on the extension of the Cultural Trail. He said he wanted to bring in iMoCA as an ammenity for other tenants of the building. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT