IBJOpinion

DINING: Chancy upgrade at IUPUI eatery

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Dining - A&E

Call me lazy, but most of the restaurants on my regular lunch rotation are within walking distance of IBJ’s downtown offices. If I drive anywhere, it’s usually to meet a friend somewhere with ample, free parking. But when Chancellor’s Restaurant (850 W. Michigan St., 231-5257) came up during a recent conversation about good local eateries, I decided to break with tradition and give it a go.

Located inside the University Place conference center on the IUPUI campus, Chancellor’s has high aspirations, with a seasonal, locally sourced menu clearly designed to appeal more to diners on an expense account than college students on a budget. Its $12 burger features Kobe beef, for example, and is topped with caramelized onions and mushrooms and a blue cheese aioli. The entrees are even more inventive.

Chancellor's pike dish Chancellor’s Great Lake Walleye Pike shows a commitment to regional ingredients. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

We showed up for lunch to find the dining room about three-quarters full, which we took as a good sign. Turns out Chancellor’s may be a victim of its own success. The staff was overwhelmed. Tables sat covered with dirty dishes. The manager started serving customers. We never got the basket of flatbread we saw on every other table. Our glasses sat empty for most of the meal. In fact, after ordering our drinks, we didn’t see our server again until he delivered the bill—which eventually was discounted 20 percent to acknowledge the slow service.

But there was a bright side: the food. Well, most of it, anyway.

We started with the Chicken Tostados ($7.50), billed as blackened chicken, onion, jalapenos and a tomato corn black bean relish on top of crispy tortilla chips. It took longer to describe it than to eat the measly five chips (yeah, that comes out to $1.50 per chip) and fairly bland topping.

Our entrees were more successful. My companion ordered off the special eat-local menu, which included four dishes and information about where the key ingredients originated. He chose the Great Lakes Walleye Pike ($11) from Chicago, which we decided was about as local as walleye gets. The fish was pan-fried and served atop a mound of black and white quinoa (keen-wah), a protein-rich grain with a slight nutty flavor that’s gaining popularity. Grilled summer squash and a green tomato and sweet corn salsa provided a nice contrast in taste and texture.

Fresh from the pork-o-rama at the Indiana State Fair, I opted for the Cuban Sandwich ($11). It was a standard Cuban: thin-sliced ham, roasted pork loin, Swiss cheese, mustard and pickle served on a pressed roll. But the pork was juicy enough—and the mustard ample enough—to avoid the dryness that can kill an otherwise tasty sandwich. The side of uber-thick fries was just OK.

Before we ordered, I was leaning toward finishing up with the Indiana Peach and Blackberry Crisp ($6) from the eat-local menu—it features Traders Point ice cream, so how could it go wrong? But by the time we finished eating, we’d waited so long for refills and some ketchup (which never arrived) that we just wanted to escape.

Although the manager apologized and gave us the discount—and validated our $9 parking garage ticket—we couldn’t help thinking what a shame it was for solid kitchen work to be tainted by front-of-the-house issues. Fact is, it doesn’t matter how good the food is if customers leave with a bad taste in their mouths.•

__________

Fourth in a month-long series of reviews of possessive restaurants.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • No Surprise
    There's nothing new at Chancellor's. Many years ago it was a decent restaurant with interesting food but no more. My husband and I tried to have dinner there 2 years ago. We were seated right away but it took 10 minutes or more for a server to show up (and the place was not busy). Then, after waiting a half hour for our cocktails, we gave up. Our server had almost insisted that we order our food before our pre-dinner drinks were served. We stopped in the bar as we were leaving and my husband mentioned to the only bartender the problem with our drinks. The bartender was rude and said we'd just have to wait. We have never been back there and will not be back. They obviously have some management problems - hiring practices, training, adequate staffing levels, or any combination of those factors. If they really want to attract customers other than the captives who are staying in the hotel, they need to make some serious changes in the way they run things.
  • Former Student & I Disagree
    First and foremost, that was a great read. It seems that you paid attention to just about everything during your visit. And I am truly sorry that you have had such a bad experience there.

    I am a former IUPUI student and I spend many afternoons working from my laptop at that very bar. I became good friends with Jeffrey (not sure if he is still behind the bar or not) and took advantage of all their great drink specials. Their food was great too. Anything from their salads to the burgers always impressed me and never left me asking for more.

    Being a student, I loved the free Wi-Fi and the beer specials. When I was going there, nearly every day of the week it seemed, on Monday and Wednesday they had pitcher specials. On Tuesday and Thursday, if you can call it a pitcher special, they had $1 pitchers of PBR. Not the best beer in the world, but I was a college student, it made sense back then!

    Being so close to the food court, I wish more students would pop their head in. And based on your negative experience it seemed that the manager did all he could to take care of you. And as far as the parking is concerned, being a student I never really had to worry about that. It was just a short walk across campus.

    I am not sure it is fair to assume this is a place that people will travel to experience. Students, of course, will eat here. As will the faculty. But I am not positive that you can use the validated parking as a reason to not return. Being a part of the hotel and being on campus their traffic is sort of built it. I would assume that they don't have to validate all that much parking to begin with.

    But like I said, that was a great read and I am gad to see a place I used to consider my second home getting some attention, all the while not strictly positive. But as a food critique myself I understand that it had to be said. Thanks again for this great read and for bringing back old memories of one of my favorite on campus hang outs!
  • OK
    The thought is there, but Chancellors food is just OK for the price and it sounds like front-of-house is a consistent problem. Last time I went, the place was empty -- literally, we were the only table for dinner -- and the service was slow, slow, slow. We waited almost 10 minutes from the time we were done with our entrees before they came to clear things and ask if we wanted anything else. Like you, we just wanted to leave when we finished our meals, so we declined.

    I believe they always validate parking in the University Place garage and there's almost always tons of parking there. From IBJ, you could also walk 2 blocks to the Red Line, which will drop you off right at University Place.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT