DINING: Get sauced at Pearl Street Pizzeria & Pub

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

I’ve heard about some experienced diners who have a six-month rule when it comes to restaurants: Give new eateries time to work the kinks out before trying them. It’s a fine idea, but I don’t have that much patience—especially when it comes to a place that’s literally in my own back yard.

Pearl Street Pizzeria & Pub (65 E. Pearl St., 638-3110) is in the Century Building, mere steps from IBJ’s back door along what many think is an alley just south of Washington Street. Pizza and beer within a pen’s throw of a newspaper? Talk about built-in clientele.

Indeed, some of my colleagues gave the pub component a post-work test as soon as the doors opened. I restrained myself for almost a week before going with a small group for lunch.

The experience was uneven—as you might expect from a restaurant that had been open only a week—but I came away hopeful about the possibilities.

Dining The Mad Greek Pizza at Pearl Street features sun-dried tomatoes, feta cheese and Kalamata olives. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Wanting to sample several menu items, we ordered three small pizzas and a large salad. While we waited for the main course, the two “veterans” in our group suggested we start with the Bread Sticks ($4.95), a moniker that doesn’t do justice to the cheese-smothered dough. Served with two of three possible dipping sauces (marinara, jalapeno cheese or ranch dressing), it was a very good start.

The Pearl Street Salad ($6.95) is different from the other three salad choices in a couple of ways: It’s the only one not available for $1.99 with a pizza, and it’s the only one served with the restaurant’s “special house dressing”—a ranch-like concoction made with sauteed green peppers and onions. Toss some of that in a bowl with fresh lettuce, chicken chunks and crispy bacon and what’s not to like?

Unfortunately, the pizzas weren’t quite so successful. Oh, we ate everything, but I’m not sure I’d order any of them again. We tried a hand-tossed Sausage ($7.25), a hand-tossed Hawaiian ($9.25) and a deep-dish Chicken Alfredo ($11.25), just to be different.

The hand-tossed crusts were pretty standard—or, as one of my companions put it, “typical bar pizza.” The only constructive criticism I heard was that the pineapple chunks were too big on the Hawaiian (which also featured ham, bacon and mozzarella atop a red sauce). I think pineapple on pizza is a crime against nature, so I’ll stay out of that debate.

Our group was similarly lukewarm about the somewhat bland Chicken Alfredo, with one exception: the buttery deep-dish crust. It was crispy and chewy in all the right places—rich without being decadent. So worth the extra couple of bucks. I wanted more.

I managed to wait three days before calling in a pickup order for a deep-dish Mad Greek ($11.25). I could just imagine the feta cheese, sun-dried tomatoes, kalamata olives and banana peppers boldly perched on top of that flaky shell. Alas, carryout confusion left me with a thin-crust version of my dream pie. I wanted to be angry, even after the manager picked up my tab, but I have to admit it still was darn tasty. Besides, there’s no way I can wait six months to try it again.•


Second in a month-long series of “street” restaurant reviews.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.