DINING: Husk-y newcomer The Tamale Place added to market options

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

First, let’s give The Tamale Place (City Market, 423-2203) points for its name—which reflects exactly how, I believe, most people view the eatery booths at City Market.

Formal monikers? Nah. Most places at the market can be boiled down to their essence. The pizza place. The soft pretzel place. The juice place, etc. And now we have the easy-to-remember Tamale Place.  

Let’s also give points for the electronic sign over the cash register that tells patrons how many of each kind of tamale are left. This helps add a sense of drama to the ordering process, especially when there are a few folks in front of you and you really, really, really want that last Chipotle Chicken Tamale.  

ae-dining-tamale-place4-15col.jpg Have a favorite tamale? At The Tamale Place, check the board to find out what’s left. (IBJ Photo/ Mason King)

And then there’s the food, which on our visits ranged from OK to outstanding.

The Tamale Place focuses on bigger-than-standard tamales with a range of fillings, all at $3.49 each. These come directly from the Tamale Place’s Rockville Road kitchen (You might have seen Guy Fieri visit there during season 12 of “Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives”). There, bags of white corn are boiled with a bit of lime. After cooling, the corn is ground and formed into tortillas and chips (the business began as Tortilleria Angelita, which focused on homemade tortillas). The ground corn dough, or masa, is also the key ingredient in tamales. For tamales, masa and other ingredients are packed into corn husks, tied, steamed, and served in their own you-open packages.

On one visit to the newly opened City Market spot, a colleague found the Chipotle Chicken Tamale to be as spicy as advertised but strictly one-dimensional in overall taste. The Beef in Red Sauce tamale was generously filled with meat, cushioned and accented by the masa. Subtle and flavorful, yes, but a bit more of the promised red sauce (or any trace of it) would have been helpful. No such complaints for the Chicken in Green Sauce, where chilies integrated nicely with the ample chicken and comforting masa.

Don’t look for crunch or doughiness in the Tacos ($2.99). One colleague enjoyed the veggie’s substantial soft tortilla and pleasantly spicy innards. I’d return for the sloppy and satisfying Spicy Chipotle Chicken any day. Make sure to include cilantro and onion for maximum effect. (In theory, onion, cilantro and other toppings have a 25-cent upcharge attached, but ours seemed to have been forgotten about.)

When I ordered Steak Nachos ($7.49), I was asked if I wanted a full or half order. Despite my answer of half, I was given—and charged for—a full pile, which offered more than enough for sharing.  

If there’s room, give in to the temptation of the Apple w/Pecan dessert tamale ($1.99) which, when unwrapped, revealed a dense mix of what would make a terrific apple pie subbing soft masa for crumbly crust.•

—Lou Harry


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.