IBJOpinion

DINING: Nothing fowl at canal-side newcomer

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Dining - A&E

I’m not a fan of outdoor dining. Why? Because I grew up in New Jersey and have been the victim of one too many snatch-and-grabs by stealthy seagulls. And though I’m aware these airborne sneak thieves are rare anywhere west of the Delaware River, I still hesitate when asked if I prefer inside or on the deck.

With spring springing, though, it seemed silly to eat anywhere but the canal-side deck when I visited Flatwater Restaurant (832 E. Westfield Blvd., 257-5466). Taking the spot formerly occupied by Bazbeaux Pizza and Canal Point Grill, it promises a respite “between the rapids of life, the twists and turns of the daily grind and the turbulent white water.”
 

dining At Flatwater Restaurant, shrimp adds character to the flavorful salsa. And outdoor seating is a must. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

I—and probably you as well—could use a helping of that. So with an eye on ducks, we took a spot on the deck and got busy with the Shrimp Salsa and Chips appetizer ($9.50), a more interesting variation on the common nachos and dip. With tiny chopped veggies and chunks of seafood, it got things off to a laid-back start.

Two meaty sandwiches were tasty but seemed a little out of place here. The Steak Sandwich ($10.50) featured substantial slices of thicker-than-Philly meat, with plenty falling out of the roll to fork up afterward. Mushrooms and caramelized onions gave it even more heft. Ditto for the Burger ($8), capped with applewood smoked bacon and a choice of cheese on a just-right Kaiser bun. Homemade fries were well worth adding for $1.50.

Visiting the entrée side of the menu, we found the Grilled Salmon ($15) a better fit for the environment. Its sesame-cilantro glaze validated our selection. And a Caesar Salad ($8.50) paired with Mahi Mahi Tacos ($8) proved an even more inspired choice. The Tacos come from the Small Plate section of the menu, a trend I’m still trying to sort out. Here, soft wraps enclosed two delicious mounds of fish, pico de gallo, cilantro and cheese, so call it what you will.

The ducks, for their part, respectfully kept to their place. Appreciating their sensitivity, I couldn’t resist tossing a bit of bread into the water to share our bounty.•


ADVERTISEMENT

  • Y R U here?
    So much venom!? Sounds like you guys should leave Indy. I mean, don't get me wrong, it's not the most cultured or open-minded kind of place, I completely agree, but the dining options are improving and diversifying. My family and I have lived in the area for about 11 years and it's only gotten better. Hogheads wasn't the best bbq, but the options for outstanding bbq are...? This is not the deep south, texas, what have you. You have to give props to those who make the effort, but there is always room to improve. Bottom line, the "What I hate about Indy..." folks can either get a better attitude or leave. Nobody's keeping you here. And yes, not really a review, was it?
  • Rude
    As much as I agree that this is not much of a culinary "review", Jonathan- you are extremely rude. You could have said that in a more polite manner. That is why I hate Indy. Rude people such as yourself. I would like to read a glorious review written by you..
  • Why I don't like Indy
    I love how Barbara think Hog's Heads served good food. To be more specific good BBQ. She also probably thinks that La Piadad is good Mexican food. Totally ignorant of what food should be and it's sad. I could see her sitting in one of those Pizza Hut commercials telling us "this is the best authentic pasta I've ever had!".

    And this is why I hate indy. There is almost no one here with any culinary sense. As Will pointed out this review lacked any culinary direction as to why I would want to dine there.

    Just a rant at a city that can't grow up culturally.
  • Dog Friendly
    With the closing of Hog's Head and the Canal Point Grille last year, we lost the best places to take the dog for a good meal. You can only eat Pizza at Greek's so often and Plump's Last Shot is so over-crowded with the furred-set that a it can get a little uncomfortable if the dogs aren't already well acquainted with each other. (Not to mention that the food at Plump's is mediocre at best).

    Last month we had to be out of the house for a showing, which means taking the 130 lb dog out for lunch. Flatwater accommodates both the furred set and the "strictly-humans please" group by allowing dogs only on the front patio, which only has 2 tables. If you don't want any whine with your meal, then the back patio is ideal for your outdoor dining pleasure. At the same time, the furry guests can be accommodated out front with wide open spaces between the tables.

    We started our meal with the bratwurst appetizer and the pulled pork nachos. My husband ordered the pulled pork sandwich and I had the pulled pork tacos. Normally, I equate pulled pork with barbecue, so I was little surprised that there was no barbecue on any of the pulled pork selections. The waitress, however, was incredibly accommodating and brought plenty of barbecue sauce, along with ample beer and a bowl of water for the dog. Being the only guests on the front patio didn't leave us forgotten, as had been the case at Canal Point.

    We will definitely make the Flatwater our primary hang-out when we dine with the pooch. So, if you dine at Flatwater and see a 130 lb dog that you can't recognize the breed, it's probably Sherlock.
  • huh?
    Will, my thoughts exactly. I thought i was reading metromix for a second. Writing the price and one descriptive sentence does not a review of a restaurant that may or may not have inside seating too.
  • Really?
    Is this a review or just a little piece about this time you overcame your fears of eating outside?

    Seriously, is this a review?

    Why doesn't Indianapolis have anyone who writes about restaurants and food with any sort of creative perspective.

    In regards to your sorting out the "trend" of eating small plates. Don't bother. The trend is about 10 years old. So unless you are waiting for it to come back into fashion in about a decade, you are sufficiently late (or early) to the party.

    This kind of haphazard type of restaurant reviewing isn't good for the restaurant which you are critiquing because you don't know enough about the business or food to give any kind of constructive criticism. Here is what they can take away from your review.
    1. The shrimp salsa will make you laid back.
    2. The Steak sandwich is inappropriate. For reasons that you fail to mention.
    3. "Ditto for the Burger"....we guess.(?)
    4. Salmon works, presumably because the restaurant is on the canal.
    5. The restaurant needs plexiglass panels surrounding the patio so morons don't feed the ducks which with a little time and constant feeding will become as unruly as those NJ seagulls causing the collapse of the entire al fresco dining scene of Indianapolis.

    This is not a review, this is a poorly documented date with yourself.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT