IBJNews

Don Marsh says he owes more than $500,000 in back taxes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Internal Revenue Service says Don Marsh owes $518,892 in federal taxes stemming from his final years as CEO of Marsh Supermarkets Inc., his lawyer revealed Thursday.

The disclosure came during the fourth day of Marsh’s civil trial. The locally based supermarket chain accuses the former CEO of using company funds to pay more than $3 million in personal expenses. Marsh, 75, spent 38 years leading the company before it was sold to Florida-based Sun Capital Partners in 2006.

Don Marsh's tax debt stems from an IRS audit that found "disallowed deductions" for personal expenses he wracked up from April 2004 to September 2006. Marsh Supermarkets ended up paying a negligence penalty in connection with the findings.

After the audit, the company sent 1099 tax forms to Don Marsh for those years listing $2 million more in compensation than it had originally reported. Marsh said he has yet to pay the $518,892 in back taxes and is unsure how the company calculated the $2 million figure.

“They dumped everything in there,” Marsh said.

The IRS says the debt stems from a tax-law change that required Marsh to count his wife’s expenses on trips they took together as additional income. Marsh testified that his wife frequently flew with him on the company jet to destinations worldwide for what he considered business travel.

Marsh’s testimony on cross-examination Thursday revealed that part of his lawyers’ strategy is to persuade jurors that the frequent trips he took on the company jet were for business and not pleasure.

In earlier testimony, Marsh admitted he took dozens of trips over the years, including several to see mistresses.

Sun Capital Partners terminated Marsh’s contract “without cause” after it took over. It stopped paying his $4.2 million severance in early 2008, after it claims it discovered widespread personal expenses charged to the company.   
 
Marsh is countersuing Sun Capital, claiming the company still owes him about half his severance.

Both sides are expected to call dozens of witnesses during the trial, which began Monday and is expected to last two weeks. Marsh testified for three consecutive days. Only one other witness has appeared on the stand.

The plodding pace of the trial prompted federal Judge Sarah Evans Barker to urge lawyers several times to pick up the pace.

“Let’s push on through this,” the judge told Marsh’s lawyer, Andrew McNeil. “I would like to finish Mr. Marsh and get another witness on the stand today.”

To which McNeil responded: “This is my last [exhibit] in this category.”

“In this category—that’s what worries me,” she shot back.

At times, Marsh’s testimony has been tense. In response to grilling by company attorney David Herzog about his expenses, Marsh at one point said, “Do you want to know something?”

That prompted Barker to warn Marsh that “you better not go there.”

Ann Diebolt, one of Don Marsh’s personal secretaries, followed Marsh on the witness stand. She explained to jurors how she logged Marsh’s personal and business expenses.

Another witness, Terry Landry-Fisher, who was director of Marsh’s floral department, had her depositions summarized in court by lawyers on both sides. Landry-Fisher now lives in California.

Marsh began as CEO in 1968. The company was founded in 1931 in Muncie and went public in 1953. Marsh has testified that his many trips helped him build the company into a billion-dollar corporation.

The trial resumes Friday morning.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • 500K in income taxes
    No, the IRS did not disallow deductions of $500,000. That is the amount of tax that is due, the amount of taxable income/disallowed deductions is much, much higher than the $500,000 in additional tax.
  • Still In Love
    I'm really enjoying the daily write up by the IBJ, thank you kindly. Keep them coming.
  • Where was the Board?
    I always thought that "boards? are there to watch over the hen house..seems to me that the board is liable for not being good stewards of the company funds..... The other question is why is this just now coming out in the light. Anyone who ever was associated with Don Marsh or his company knew that he was a sleaze when it came to women.Im surprised he never got a harassment charge against him.
  • Board of Directors over sight?
    Per Terry's observation that the BOD kind of dropped the ball on oversight, I would guess that Mr. Marsh had that packed with people who wouldn't challenge him on anything either...there are a lot of BOD's that are a rubber stamp, especially for a guy with his name on the building. This is an interesting case, for sure. This stuff goes on everywhere, but from the testimony so far, you would have to say that Mr. Marsh certainly seemed to think that he could do about anything he wanted and call it business. We will see what the jury thinks...the fact that the Judge is getting impatient with defense counsel would make one think that McNeil is having to work awfully hard to make his point that "it was all business"
  • Marsh
    Disallowed personal deductition of over HALF OF MILLION DOLLARS over 2 years! He didn't know that? No doubt. Indianapolis sure has a who's who of ......
    • Like many who live high on the hog,
      he ends his days in prison. Well, maybe his enjoyment of it all is worth the price he'll pay.
    • It is Easy
      In large organizations like Marsh Supermarkets, it is common for the executives to add in a few personal items on expense accounts, because the money is not really their money. Marsh's personal secretary wrote down what he told her to write down, when it came to expenses or any other corporate action. Personal Secretaries want to keep their job, so rarely do you find a secretary arguing with the boss over expense account reporting. I previously offered that Mr. Marsh still had his day coming with the IRS, and it came sooner than I expected. Don Marsh has a problem and the IRS will not go away following this court event. As for the Marsh claims that he had no knowledge of the changes to the tax code and world events regarding CEO's abusing corporate expense accounts, it appears he was too busy to read the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, or the Daily News during those business trips to New York. Abuse of corporate power and the misuse of corporate funds does not happen by accident. What, may I ask, was the Board of Directors doing throughout this abuse of power and overstatement of expense spending?
    • Don the dufus
      what a lack of awareness? he probably thought he was above the law too. Damage control as sun capital markets (who owns marsh) can't take the marsh name off their stores soon enough.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT