IBJNews

DORA: Technology can divide customers, businesses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Voices-from-Industry-dora-jim.jpgThe service industry is alive and well in this country. In fact, every business supplies a service to a paying customer. Whether it is a physical item constructed or a specific service provided, everyone is truly in the service business.

Why, then, is the service often terrible? Is technology partially to blame?

In today’s fast-paced world, we want everything delivered to us at the speed of light. The world’s information at our fingertips has made us an impatient society. Self-service in all industries has caused us to become accustomed to a level of service that may be satisfactory for many transactions, but certainly not all of them. The demand for low cost and high speed often takes the human touch out of many of our daily transactions.

And yet service can make the difference between becoming a commodity product or being a memorable experience.

Technology has allowed for a level of disconnect from provider to customer, or vice versa, that is alarming.

As an example, recently I received an e-mail complaint from a customer in my company’s general information in-box. After it was forwarded to me, I certainly expected to find that the customer had already checked out of the hotel. Upon calling the general manager, we found that the customer was still in the hotel and had checked in only an hour earlier. I was amazed that an unhappy customer, who had just checked in, would send a complaint to a general information mailbox instead of contacting the front desk for the hotel manager to address the issues.

Luckily, we were able to find the customer and fix the problem. I hope this attention will be remembered and this customer will continue to consider us in the future.

Why will some customers allow for the time it takes to properly provide them the service they desire, relish the experience that can come with that service, and pay the appropriate amount for the experience? Why will the same customer view another experience as strictly a commodity transaction and demand the lowest cost while ignoring the potential experience they may receive in the transaction?

Moreover, how can a brick-and-mortar business use technology to provide the service and experience desired by our customers in the way they wish to be served? How can we engage in a relationship with a customer who might want to avoid direct contact?

Good service will always require having the right person in place with the ability and training to anticipate needs along with the power to provide for those needs. Finding the person who truly enjoys providing a great customer service experience and who wants to create a relationship will always be the key in creating an experience where the customer will choose to return.

Creating a relationship in a very short time frame can mean the beginning of what can become a lifelong relationship between customer and service provider. In that same time frame, with the wrong person in place or by not meeting the needs of the customer, the relationship can be ruined for a lifetime.

While it seems clear what a business needs to provide to create the experience the customer wants, the customer also needs to be involved.

As a service provider, I want to know where I exceed expectations, but I really want to know where I have not. And I want to know it as soon as possible, preferably while the customer is still in my business so I have the opportunity to make things right.

Technology has created the ability for anyone to reach thousands or millions of people quickly. It has also allowed for the removal of the human contact point. And it has allowed personal communication and interaction to fall to a very low level or to not exist at all.

As a service provider, I want to know when I have failed in providing the service expected. And, above all, I want to make it right for the customer.

Call me, write me, e-mail me, text me, tweet me. Use any type of technology you like. Allow me to serve you and to earn and keep your business.•

__________

Dora is president of General Hotels Corp. in Indianapolis. Views expressed here are the writer’s.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT