Drought could have mixed impact for Indiana farmers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Some Indiana farmers facing big crop losses because of this summer's drought could end up making higher profits this fall, but others stand to lose money.

Less than half of the normal amount of rain has fallen across much of the state since May 1. The National Weather Service said last month was the driest June on record for Indianapolis and Evansville.

Corn is beginning to tassel early in the dry weather, especially in southern Indiana, where pollination is largely complete, Purdue Extension economist Chris Hurt told The Associated Press on Monday.

"Stress at time of pollination is the single worst factor for crop yields," he said, and the water-starved corn and soybean crops are likely to produce smaller yields.

That's bound to affect most farmers, who typically sell 20 percent to 40 percent of their anticipated harvest in advance, promising to deliver a specified amount of grain to buyers and at a guaranteed price.

Farmers could lose money if prices rise above their locked-in rate due to supply and demand, Hurt said. In that case, they would have made more money by not selling in advance. And if they can't deliver enough grain, they have to buy back the bushels they can't supply.

The more farmers sold in advance, the harder the financial hit they are likely to take, Hurt said. If a farmer sells half of his crop in advance, and then only half of his expected crop comes in for harvest, he would have to sell his entire crop at the promised price even if grain prices are higher at harvest time, he said.

"We've been hearing of producers calling their grain managers and talking with them about the possibilities of dealing with these yield reductions," Hurt said previously in a Purdue news release. "Right now, it's hard to say what will happen because nobody knows where grain prices are going to go."

But if yield losses are widespread enough this year, higher prices could help compensate farmers for some of their lost crop, he said.

"When a major production state has reduced yields due to something like drought conditions, prices generally go higher than yields go down," Hurt said in the news release. "So if yield losses for an entire region or a state were 10 percent but prices go up by, say, 15 or 20 percent, actual revenues in a drought year can be higher than in a year when you have normal yields."

The drought also could increase the value of stored grain left over from the 2011 crop season.

"We have a very bullish situation ahead if the drought continues," Hurt said last week. "We could have quite an explosive market. But that could all change if we get rain."


  • comment title
    To Mr. Wright's idea... it is called an "aqueduct" or colloquially sometimes "robbing Peter to pay Paul." It's already done in California and it's why many Hoosiers have lettuce on their tables in December. So much water is taken from the norther California [Sacramento etc.] that it has caused it's own problems of habitat/environmental destruction... and a bunch of grumpy farmers now that the water has been cut back under court order. I would bet that the lake water alluded to is already spoken for.
  • drought
    we will always have droughts and if we look a cpl hundred miles north we will find 5 of the biggest fresh water lakes in the world..build a pipeline down and branch off to other regions to help with the farming and it would also create some jobs also. the oil industry does it. why not water????

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

    2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

    3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

    4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

    5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim