IBJNews

Duke meets market expectations despite quarterly loss

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Duke Realty Corp. lost $32.1 million in the third quarter, but managed to meet analyst expectations in a key measurement for real estate investment trusts.

The Indianapolis-based REIT announced Thursday afternoon that it lost $32.1 million, or 13 cents per share, compared with earnings of $34.1 million, or 13 cents per share, in the same quarter a year earlier.

Last year's third-quarter earnings were boosted significantly by a $57.5 million gain attributed to the company’s acquisition of its partner’s share of a joint venture that owns 106 industrial buildings in the Midwest and Southeast. Duke paid $298.2 million for the 50-percent stake in Dugan Realty LLC. Duke Realty Limited Partnership already owned the other half of the venture.

Revenue rose slightly in the third quarter, to $361.26 million from $360.65 million a year ago.

The company reported second quarter core funds from operations of $76.1 million, or 29 cents per share, down from $77.9 million, or 30 cents per share, a year ago. The core FFO met predictions of 14 analysts polled by Thomson Reuters. FFO is a common performance measure used by REITS

Duke narrowed its 2011 FFO predictions of between $1.06 and $1.18 per share to between $1.13 to $1.15 per share.

The occupancy rate for Duke’s portfolio of properties, including those under development,  rose 1.4 percentage points, to 90.7 percent from June 30 to Sept. 30.

The occupancy rate is at its highest level since 2005.

Duke acquired $103.5 million of mainly industrial buildings in the third period and made $6.2 million in dispositions.

Company shares closed trading Wednesday at $11.75 each, down from a 52-week high of $15.63 in May.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT