IBJNews

  • Home

Fraud suspect Durham released from halfway house

Scott Olson
April 11, 2011
Keywords
Banking & Finance, Courts, Fraud, Investing, Investment Losses, Judges, Law, Legal Issues, Obsidian Enterprises, Securities fraud
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A federal magistrate granted the release of Tim Durham from a halfway house on Monday after the indicted financier produced a more thorough accounting of his finances.

Magistrate Kennard Foster, unsatisfied with Durham’s financial disclosures, ordered him on April 6 to a halfway house at 611 N. Capitol Ave. in Indianapolis operated by Volunteers of America of Indiana Inc.

On Monday, Durham produced a 20-page statement that met Foster’s approval. The document is sealed to the public.

Durham, 48, is charged with 12 felony counts, including conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud. He and two business partners, James Cochran and Rick Snow, are accused of defrauding about 5,000 investors in Akron, Ohio-based Fair Finance Co. of more than $200 million.

Durham, whose whereabouts will be monitored by a GPS tracking device, will stay at an undisclosed location. Durham’s lawyer, Howard Srebnick of Miami, said he would not stay at the 10,700-square-foot estate Durham previously owned at Geist Reservoir.

Durham was arrested March 16 at his home in Los Angeles.

A federal magistrate in Los Angeles on March 21 ordered Durham, who lives in California, released on $1 million bond. The bond was posted by Joan and Beurt SerVaas, Durham’s ex-wife and her father.

Foster on Monday ordered Durham to secure the surety bond within seven days. Srebnick told Foster that “we have property that is worth double the value of the bond, free and clear of any encumbrances, owned by Beurt SerVaas.”

A jury trial is set for June 8, 2012.

More of IBJ's coverage of Tim Durham and Fair Finance can be found here.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • re
    Braindeadormissing IndyApril 11, 2011 5:44 PM
    Um, did you read anything? Who gets a loan for $20M for 8 years without making a single interest or principle payment like Tim's buddy Dan and without securing the necessary UCC filings to perfect the loans? And the same situation for every single person Durham handed money to? As in the tune of over $100M.

    Glad to know you have voting rights, now I understand how Obama got elected.

    Too bad the judge didn't make Timmy turn in actual bank and brokerage statements. Hey Judge Foster, Tim has no net worth. The only money to his name he wanted to have discussed in a private hearing so his creditors can't garnish the money he needs to pay Roy with. HELLO. In a divorce proceeding would you let me show a voodoo excel spreadsheet? Nah, I'd have to show deposits and checks for the last five years and all savings and brokerage accounts.

    Only in Indy, imbeciles continue to reign along with the greatest hub of white collar crime.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Just a Thought
    superindyApril 11, 2011 4:35 PM
    When you think about it, Durham and Cochran went terrible money manager, and engaged in questionable behavior, however, I dont think it constitutes fraud. I mean them taking out loans they couldn't repay is no worse that someone who spends more on credit cards that they can afford to repay.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    ADVANCED SEARCH
    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ

    1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

    2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

    3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

    4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

    5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

    ADVERTISEMENT