IBJNews

Fraud suspect Durham released from halfway house

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A federal magistrate granted the release of Tim Durham from a halfway house on Monday after the indicted financier produced a more thorough accounting of his finances.

Magistrate Kennard Foster, unsatisfied with Durham’s financial disclosures, ordered him on April 6 to a halfway house at 611 N. Capitol Ave. in Indianapolis operated by Volunteers of America of Indiana Inc.

On Monday, Durham produced a 20-page statement that met Foster’s approval. The document is sealed to the public.

Durham, 48, is charged with 12 felony counts, including conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud. He and two business partners, James Cochran and Rick Snow, are accused of defrauding about 5,000 investors in Akron, Ohio-based Fair Finance Co. of more than $200 million.

Durham, whose whereabouts will be monitored by a GPS tracking device, will stay at an undisclosed location. Durham’s lawyer, Howard Srebnick of Miami, said he would not stay at the 10,700-square-foot estate Durham previously owned at Geist Reservoir.

Durham was arrested March 16 at his home in Los Angeles.

A federal magistrate in Los Angeles on March 21 ordered Durham, who lives in California, released on $1 million bond. The bond was posted by Joan and Beurt SerVaas, Durham’s ex-wife and her father.

Foster on Monday ordered Durham to secure the surety bond within seven days. Srebnick told Foster that “we have property that is worth double the value of the bond, free and clear of any encumbrances, owned by Beurt SerVaas.”

A jury trial is set for June 8, 2012.

More of IBJ's coverage of Tim Durham and Fair Finance can be found here.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • re
    Um, did you read anything? Who gets a loan for $20M for 8 years without making a single interest or principle payment like Tim's buddy Dan and without securing the necessary UCC filings to perfect the loans? And the same situation for every single person Durham handed money to? As in the tune of over $100M.

    Glad to know you have voting rights, now I understand how Obama got elected.

    Too bad the judge didn't make Timmy turn in actual bank and brokerage statements. Hey Judge Foster, Tim has no net worth. The only money to his name he wanted to have discussed in a private hearing so his creditors can't garnish the money he needs to pay Roy with. HELLO. In a divorce proceeding would you let me show a voodoo excel spreadsheet? Nah, I'd have to show deposits and checks for the last five years and all savings and brokerage accounts.

    Only in Indy, imbeciles continue to reign along with the greatest hub of white collar crime.
  • Just a Thought
    When you think about it, Durham and Cochran went terrible money manager, and engaged in questionable behavior, however, I dont think it constitutes fraud. I mean them taking out loans they couldn't repay is no worse that someone who spends more on credit cards that they can afford to repay.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT