IBJNews

East-side biz incubator's new owner is old owner

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Enterprise Center on the near-east side has been acquired by a local investor group led by the former owner of the troubled business incubator.

Alcatraz Investments LLC said Tuesday that it purchased the building at 55 S. State St. for an undisclosed amount.

The acquisition comes nearly a year after Wells Fargo Bank attempted to foreclose on the building by suing Indianapolis Enterprise Center LLC to recoup a $3.1 million loan balance.

Scott Meyers, president of Alcatraz Investments, sold the 188,000-square-foot incubator to the group known as Indianapolis Enterprise Center LLC in 2007.

At that time, the center had 72 tenants and was 96-percent occupied. Occupancy since has fallen to 64 percent, said Meyers, who previously owned the center for a couple of years before selling it to devote more attention to his self-storage business.

“We’re genuinely excited about the opportunity to add this property back into our portfolio, having sold it back in 2007,” Meyers said in a prepared statement. "The timing was perfect, as demand for storage and Industrial space is growing in this market, and the need for small, affordable office space has never been greater than during the recession.”

The property will receive several upgrades and renovations to compensate for the previous owner’s lack of upkeep, he said.

“It just had bare-bones maintenance done, if you can call it that,” Meyers said.

Improvements planned by Meyers during the next six months include renovating the common areas, lobby, break rooms and conference rooms, in addition to the parking lot. Landscaping also will be improved, and the heating and air conditioning system upgraded, he said.

The 78-year-old building once served as a grocery warehouse for A&P.

National Library Bindery Co. of Indiana Inc. is one of the center’s larger tenants. Half Price Books, Bosma Industries and HealthNet Inc. are former tenants.
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT