IBJNews

Indianapolis Economic Development Inc. boasts job-creation success

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

If Indianapolis Economic Development Inc. CEO Scott Miller ever feels like a refrigerator salesman at the North Pole, he’s not letting on. In the worst recession since the Great Depression, it must be difficult to broker business expansions. But Miller’s making no excuses for the city’s job creation and retention figures. In fact, he’s touting them.

Miller

“In any given economy, somebody’s going to have their best year ever,” he said. “We’re trying to find these companies and help them grow.”

Miller took charge of IEDI a year ago for Republican Mayor Greg Ballard. So far in 2009, IEDI reports it has completed 30 projects, resulting in 2,295 new jobs created as of Sept. 14. IEDI’s efforts this year have also retained 3,476 jobs at businesses that considered moving elsewhere. And Miller said IEDI’s activities have convinced companies to make $132.9 million in local capital investments.

Still, the numbers are down from 2006, the best year for local economic development in recent memory, when the city landed $625.9 million in capital investments from businesses that created 4,921 new jobs and retained 14,207 more.

Miller, who commands a staff of 10, points to success stories such as the expansions of locally based AIT Laboratories, BioStorage Technologies, Comlux Corp. and StreetLinks National Appraisal Services. IEDI had a hand in all their expansions.

IEDI hasn’t propped up its numbers by using lavish incentives.

Under Miller, IEDI has been downright stingy with tax abatements, attracting $18.01 on average in private investment for every $1 of property-tax exemption authorized. That’s much higher than the ratio under Ballard’s Democratic predecessor Bart Peterson, when the amount of private investment gained per $1 ranged in various years from $3.39 to $15.89.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • IBJ....really!?
    I wish I had all the time in my life back that I have invested in reading worthless articles & tidbits from the IBJ. As a conservative, I am just not on this "Ballard & Company" bandwagon. This blurb was straight propaganda - how about some details of these deals the IEDI has supposedly done? Over how many years were these economic "investments" in Indianapolis committed? - and I love hearing "retained" next to the word "jobs." That's like the Obama Administration claiming they "saved" x number of jobs. I would like to know the net effect of "retaining" these jobs - something is always given away, whether it's tax incentives or training grants. By the way, the Indianapolis GDP is nearly $90 billion, does $133 million over X years create a ripple? I am not suggesting the IEDI is not a valuable organization, but let's not pat this mayor on the back just yet.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT