IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: A last chance for City Market

 IBJ Staff
October 30, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

We like the changes afoot at City Market. But if the latest attempt to reposition it doesn’t work, the city should consider mothballing the beloved old building until its surroundings become a benefit rather than a liability.

As IBJ reported last week, the market is building momentum that city officials hope will lead to its becoming financially sound. Key to the effort is broadening the market’s appeal so it isn’t just a lunch destination for downtown workers.

Toward that end, six tenants are moving in next month. The new arrivals include a fresh produce shop, a florist, and purveyors of juice, crepes and soup. The Chef’s Academy will open a research-and-development kitchen there. A lot of hope is pinned on the new Tomlinson Tap Room, a bar on the second floor that will serve craft beers on tap from around the state.

We hope the new tenants’ chances of succeeding will be bolstered by a $2.7 million renovation that is slow to start but by next spring should result in a brighter, more appealing market. Besides cosmetic changes, the market will get new rest rooms, a new bicycle hub (to be built inside the east wing) and more green space outdoors when the west wing is demolished.

The bar and bike hub haven’t been tried before and just might draw a new crowd to the market, but we wonder if cosmetic changes and a new tenant mix will be enough to help the market turn the corner.

It’s likely the market’s long-term future depends on what happens to the vacant Market Square Arena site across the street. If hundreds of apartments and a retail hub emerge at the site, which has been vacant for 10 years, it might be just what the market needs to thrive. Identifying a use for the MSA site that positions the market to succeed should be a priority for the city.

Public transportation and, to a lesser extent, the redevelopment of old City Hall at Alabama and Ohio streets, could also influence the market’s long-term prospects.

We hope the newest City Market plan is an unqualified success. If it isn’t, city leaders must bide their time until conditions are ripe for a full-fledged overhaul.

Voting is your duty

It’s always amazing to hear from political pundits that large groups of voters are expected to “sit this one out” as an important election approaches.

We assume—we hope correctly—that most IBJ readers aren’t prone to such inaction. With our state and nation facing vexing issues too numerous to mention, the very idea that anyone who is registered to vote would fail to do so is inconceivable.

Those who drop out of the process because they are discouraged by their party’s chances only make matters worse by not voting. Others don’t take the time to vote because they’re confident their favorite candidate or party will win handily. They shouldn’t be so sure.

This election doesn’t have the sex appeal of 2008, but the stakes are still high. Please make voting a priority Nov. 2.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT