IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Daniels on target on township reform

 IBJ Staff
January 15, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Most of the media coverage of Gov. Mitch Daniels’ State of the State address focused on his ambitious plans to overhaul and improve education in Indiana.

With his high school chemistry teacher, Bob Watson, watching from the gallery, the Republican governor made another compelling case that the status quo isn’t working. He noted that 99 percent of Indiana teachers are rated “effective,” yet only one of three of the state’s students can pass the national math or reading exams.

But we are pleased that the two-term governor doesn’t intend to expend his considerable political capital on just that one important issue. He also went into surprising detail about his plan to reform local government.

To be sure, it’s a dry topic, not one likely to enrapture many Hoosiers as the legislation wends its way through the General Assembly this spring. But it’s an important one, especially at a time tax caps have forced many units of local government to cut back on essential services.

The topic is far from new, of course. Year after year, many of the state’s more progressive politicians have pushed the General Assembly to enact the reforms proposed as part of the Kernan-Shepard report of 2007. A statistical model run by Mike Hicks, a Ball State economist, estimated $470 million in annual savings statewide from the reforms, about 90 percent of which would come from township consolidation.

Daniels’ speech devoted seven paragraphs to government reform—more than he devoted to any legislative priority other than education (23).

“Some of the changes are so obvious that our failure to make them is a daily embarrassment,” the governor said.

He added: “Today, over 4,000 politicians, few of them known to the voters they represent, run over a thousand township governments. They are sitting on hundreds of millions of dollars in reserves. Some have eight years of spending needs stashed in the bank, yet they keep collecting taxes.”

Daniels drew only polite applause when he called for the elimination of township government—a sharp reminder of the challenges he faces getting lawmakers, many of whom came up through township government, to do the right thing.

But this may be the governor’s last, best chance to get reforms approved. The financial pressures on local government likely will ease as the economy improves, sapping momentum from efforts to bolster efficiency.

And Daniels is operating from a position of strength. He’s popular, and is working with an Indiana General Assembly that has both chambers controlled by the GOP for the first time since 2006.

If the governor succeeds in reforming education, he’ll have one more achievement to tout should he decide to run for president. In contrast, his fight to reform local government isn’t a headline grabber. We’re glad he’s making it a priority, nonetheless.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT