IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: GM dispute deserves vote

IBJ Staff
August 21, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

At IBJ deadline, there didn’t appear to be any movement on the stalemate that threatens to close General Motors Corp.’s Indianapolis stamping plant for good. It will be a shame if the transportation-related manufacturing that has taken place at the site that hugs the White River just south of West Washington Street since horse and buggy days comes to an end.

We don’t expect the parties involved to care about history, but it’s puzzling to us that leaders of the United Auto Workers Local 23 are against members even casting a vote on the proposed takeover of the plant by Illinois-based J.D. Norman Industries.

If the facts favor the Local’s argument against Norman, leadership shouldn’t fear putting the proposal to a vote.

Indeed, there’s plenty not to like if you’re working at the plant and making a union wage. Hourly base wages would fall from $29 to $15.50. No one likes a big pay cut. Many workers would rather see the plant close and maintain their current pay by transferring to a GM plant in another city.

Norman says workers could retain their jobs while pursuing a transfer, but workers say there won’t be as much need for their services elsewhere within GM if the plant stays open under Norman as a supplier to the auto giant.

Norman, for its part, seems to be bending over backward to make this work. It’s offering lump-sum payments to workers to help bridge the gap between their old and new salaries.

The company also points out that the one-third of plant workers who are eligible for retirement can retire with their full GM pension and benefits and continue working at the plant under the wage scale Norman is offering. They’re also offering the plant’s 90 temporary employees full-time employment with benefits.

But there’s more to the story than the futures of the more than 650 workers at the plant.

GM, legions of unemployed Hoosiers and the city of Indianapolis also have a stake in the outcome.

GM, which announced in 2007 it would close the plant next year, is duty bound to become a leaner, more efficient car manufacturer. It emerged from bankruptcy protection last year thanks to a $50 billion government bailout. The company can’t conduct business as usual. It has to do more with less in order to keep its recovery on track and take back ownership from the American taxpayer.

Workers at the plant seem oblivious to the company’s plight—and to the suffering of all those who are unemployed who would love to collect the salary and benefits.

An empty plant is no help to those people, and the lost tax revenue and idle real estate is the last thing the cash-strapped city of Indianapolis needs right now.

The most vocal critics of the Norman deal owe it to their co-workers, the city’s unemployed and the city itself—a city many of them have lived in their entire lives—to see that Norman’s proposal comes up for a vote.

If the deal is as bad as they say, the vote will seal the plant’s fate. But at least those who work there will have had their say.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Look at yourself first.
    It seems that all the pundits from Rush Limbaugh to the World Socialist Website have entered the fray concerning the fate of the Indianapolis stamping plant while the real culprits escape scrutiny and feign innocence.

    Before calling them out, however, I would like to exonerate the loyal and hard working members of UAW Local 23 who look on the public disdain with incredulity as if they have not quite yet conceded enough. To demand that they act against their own self interests to benefit a modern-day Andrew Carnegie wannabe is akin to asking every American who could possibly retire to do so whether or not they are financially ready to step aside in order to lower the unemployment rate. It is irresponsible and inane.
    As a third-generation autoworker at the plant with 75 years of service between myself, father, and grandfather, each have witnessed the decline from 5000+ employees to the current 551 seniority employees.

    What precipitated the unsustainable decline?

    The truth is the very aforementioned culprits who assail the workers exercising our right to freely choose who we will or will not work for all the while driving a vehicle made by a foreign-owned company. The entire blame for the current debacle lies with those who like our erstwhile mayor decided to purchase 85 Toyotas in lieu of the Chevrolet Malibu regardless of the fact that the Indianapolis stamping plant made a major portion thereof.

    General Motors has closed its Pittsburgh, Grand Rapids, Mansfield, Pontiac, and Indianapolis stamping plants as a direct response to the falling demand of American-owned companies' vehicles concomitant with a rise in foreign-owned companies' cars and trucks. If you want to know who is to blame for the latest American factory failure, look no further than you and your neighbors' driveways.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

ADVERTISEMENT