
At IBJ deadline, there didn’t appear to be any movement on the stalemate that threatens to close General Motors
Corp.’s Indianapolis stamping plant for good. It will be a shame if the transportation-related manufacturing that has
taken place at the site that hugs the White River just south of West Washington Street since horse and buggy days comes to
an end.
We don’t expect the parties involved to care about history, but it’s puzzling to us that leaders of the United
Auto Workers Local 23 are against members even casting a vote on the proposed takeover of the plant by Illinois-based J.D.
Norman Industries.
If the facts favor the Local’s argument against Norman, leadership shouldn’t fear putting the proposal to a vote.
Indeed, there’s plenty not to like if you’re working at the plant and making a union wage. Hourly base wages
would fall from $29 to $15.50. No one likes a big pay cut. Many workers would rather see the plant close and maintain their
current pay by transferring to a GM plant in another city.
Norman says workers could retain their jobs while pursuing a transfer, but workers say there won’t be as much need
for their services elsewhere within GM if the plant stays open under Norman as a supplier to the auto giant.
Norman, for its part, seems to be bending over backward to make this work. It’s offering lump-sum payments to workers
to help bridge the gap between their old and new salaries.
The company also points out that the one-third of plant workers who are eligible for retirement can retire with their full
GM pension and benefits and continue working at the plant under the wage scale Norman is offering. They’re also offering
the plant’s 90 temporary employees full-time employment with benefits.
But there’s more to the story than the futures of the more than 650 workers at the plant.
GM, legions of unemployed Hoosiers and the city of Indianapolis also have a stake in the outcome.
GM, which announced in 2007 it would close the plant next year, is duty bound to become a leaner, more efficient car manufacturer.
It emerged from bankruptcy protection last year thanks to a $50 billion government bailout. The company can’t conduct
business as usual. It has to do more with less in order to keep its recovery on track and take back ownership from the American
taxpayer.
Workers at the plant seem oblivious to the company’s plight—and to the suffering of all those who are unemployed
who would love to collect the salary and benefits.
An empty plant is no help to those people, and the lost tax revenue and idle real estate is the last thing the cash-strapped
city of Indianapolis needs right now.
The most vocal critics of the Norman deal owe it to their co-workers, the city’s unemployed and the city itself—a
city many of them have lived in their entire lives—to see that Norman’s proposal comes up for a vote.
If the deal is as bad as they say, the vote will seal the plant’s fate. But at least those who work there will have
had their say.•
__________
To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

















IBJ Conversations
1 Comments
Add Comment
Before calling them out, however, I would like to exonerate the loyal and hard working members of UAW Local 23 who look on the public disdain with incredulity as if they have not quite yet conceded enough. To demand that they act against their own self interests to benefit a modern-day Andrew Carnegie wannabe is akin to asking every American who could possibly retire to do so whether or not they are financially ready to step aside in order to lower the unemployment rate. It is irresponsible and inane.
As a third-generation autoworker at the plant with 75 years of service between myself, father, and grandfather, each have witnessed the decline from 5000+ employees to the current 551 seniority employees.
What precipitated the unsustainable decline?
The truth is the very aforementioned culprits who assail the workers exercising our right to freely choose who we will or will not work for all the while driving a vehicle made by a foreign-owned company. The entire blame for the current debacle lies with those who like our erstwhile mayor decided to purchase 85 Toyotas in lieu of the Chevrolet Malibu regardless of the fact that the Indianapolis stamping plant made a major portion thereof.
General Motors has closed its Pittsburgh, Grand Rapids, Mansfield, Pontiac, and Indianapolis stamping plants as a direct response to the falling demand of American-owned companies' vehicles concomitant with a rise in foreign-owned companies' cars and trucks. If you want to know who is to blame for the latest American factory failure, look no further than you and your neighbors' driveways.