IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Legislators should let public decide on transit plan

IBJ Staff
November 13, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

A more robust public transportation system might be just what the region needs to connect people with jobs, spark development near transit stops, elevate the city’s stature, and reduce the need to regularly pour millions into widening our roads.

Or it might be a big, unnecessary waste of money.

That’s the $1.2 billion question. That’s roughly the amount local taxpayers could be expected to cover if the $2.5 billion revised plan laid out Nov. 8 by Indy Connect is built. The plan calls for rail service from downtown to Noblesville and Franklin and a dramatic increase in bus service across the region.

There’s widespread agreement that our woeful public transportation system needs help. Whether the public has the appetite to pay for it is the question. One thing is certain: Public transportation has gained traction as a public-policy question since Indy Connect was launched two years ago.

The collaboration of private-sector interests and government transportation planners set out to attack the long-simmering question of public transportation in economic terms by doing a cost-benefit analysis.

Involving respected private-sector players the likes of Mark Miles, president and CEO of the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership, and Allan Hubbard, a longtime local business executive, was supposed to give us a more credible answer than what we’ve heard before from people who make a living planning and promoting public transportation systems.

So, what did this public-private partnership determine? That public transit’s benefits would indeed be worth the cost. The final determination should be made by taxpayers, of course. They’re the ones who would pay. And they’ve filled meeting halls with comments both pro and con since Indy Connect began gathering feedback on the plan.

But the public is in danger of being shut out of the process.

The General Assembly decides whether the various central Indiana counties that are part of the plan can take the question to voters. That’s anything but certain in today’s political climate, which is decidedly anti-tax, anti-spend.

Elected representatives sticking constituents with a tax increase, especially in this economy, is a bad idea. But letting voters decide for themselves is another matter entirely.

Legislators know the difference. In recent years, they’ve grown accustomed to putting tough questions before voters. Tax questions are regularly the subject of referenda these days. And in recent years, Republicans, who will call the shots next year with their large majorities in both houses, have complained loudly that voters should have a say on the question of gay marriage.

Do they really trust voters, or were their comments only political bluster meant to score points on that particular issue?

We’ll find out soon enough. Will they protect us from ourselves, or trust us with an up-or-down vote on funding public transportation?•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Taxpayers cost
    I believe the total cost is planned at over $8 billion. How can anyone have the view that federal money is government money when government money is truly taxpayer dollars sent to D.C. and then sent back.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT