IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Open the Market Square Arena process

 IBJ Staff
May 25, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Mayor Greg Ballard should reverse his decision to keep the redevelopment proposals for the former Market Square Arena site under wraps. Opening the process to the public, thus sourcing the crowd, would increase chances of a better fit for the neighborhood and the city.

Much speculation is swirling around the six proposals under consideration by the administration, particularly one for a 52-story tower that would eclipse the tallest building in the state, Chase Tower, by four floors. The size of the project is probably a pipe dream, but that’s why it’s generating plenty of intrigue, as IBJ reporter Scott Olson writes in a story on page three this week.

This is about a lot more than satiating inquisitive minds, though. It’s fundamentally about the principle of open government. Ballard shouldn’t need reminding that citizens have the right to know what their government is thinking, and this alone is sufficient reason to pull back the curtain.

Ballard also is mistaken in believing the city can wrangle a better deal by interviewing developers outside of public glare. By the time the winner is announced and enters the regular approval gauntlet, it’s too late to integrate major changes.

Opening a government process to sunshine always draws silly, uninformed comment. But it also attracts keen observations from people who know the city, the market, the industry, the neighborhood. The few people in city hall sifting the proposals, however savvy they might be, are more isolated than necessary from the considerable knowledge and experience of dozens of outside experts who might weigh in. The city needs those perspectives.

Transparency is also a reasonably effective antidote to hubris, as outside accountability has a way of stopping imprudent decisions before they get put in writing. The more that government officials, or anyone in the private sector for that matter, think they can handle a complex decision like this one by themselves, the more cause for caution.

Beyond these reasons, opening the process helps build trust and confidence in government. Decisions made behind closed doors are decisions easily second-guessed.

And openness on the MSA site might help blunt fallout from the Land Bank scandal that broke wide open last week. The last thing Ballard needs now is a bungled selection process.

The parking expanse that once was the Indiana Pacers palace has been spruced up with landscaping, but it still separates the vibrant downtown from neighborhoods immediately east, communicating a message that the city can’t attract quality redevelopment, can’t get its act together.

Ballard made the right call to take another run at filling the space. It’s time to move ahead.

But he should recognize that the project he green-lights will alter the skyline, the neighborhood, the movement of people and the city’s reputation. The decision is too important to rest with a small klatch of people.•

Send comments on this editorial to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT