EDITORIAL: State education chief's agenda gets good grades

 IBJ Staff
August 28, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Tony Bennett, the state’s superintendent of public instruction for nearly two years, deserves accolades for shoving education reform toward the top of Indiana’s agenda.

Unlike his predecessor, Suellen Reed, who seemed little more than a cheerleader for schools, Bennett is pushing hard-nosed reforms.

And while at times he’s unfairly cast the state’s powerful teachers’ union—the Indiana State Teachers Association—as a villain, Bennett wisely struck a more productive, collaborative tone during his State of Education address Aug. 23. The New Albany Republican avoided the rhetoric that scores political points but does little to actually improve schools.

To be sure, he championed one of his biggest issues—the need to tie teacher promotion and recognition to student performance. He criticized the current system that rewards teachers financially solely on the number of years they teach and the degrees they hold.

But he also acknowledged that the problems of the worst schools go deeper than the teachers in the classrooms. The problem also is a leadership void in the principal’s office.

Bennett said administrators he met with in districts with some of the lowest-performing schools reported that as many as three-fourths of their teachers were ineffective.

“More shocking to me is that some building administrators have failed to conduct rigorous annual examinations to identify ineffective teachers, or they have failed to take appropriate actions when teachers are found ineffective,” he said.

At another point in the speech, he added, “More than any other reform ... we must focus our efforts on the only factors proven to make a big impact on student achievement: great teachers and great school leadership.”

We’re all for accountability, and we like Bennett’s efforts to begin grading schools on an easy-to-understand A through F scale. Our reservations are all about execution and methodology. Students are not widgets, and test scores—while important—shouldn’t be the sole measure of a school’s effectiveness.

Similarly, we applaud Bennett’s commitment to expecting more of schools with large numbers of low-income and minority students—groups that have historically underperformed. But the new grading system must factor in the additional challenges schools serving those populations face. Often, by the time children from impoverished families enter first grade, they’re already woefully behind peers.

Bennett rightfully points out that throwing money at schools is not the solution. But wise investments in the right areas can help. During his 60-minute address, Bennett didn’t say a word about universal full-day kindergarten—which would have a huge, positive impact on the state’s most at-risk kids. We’d like to see him champion that costly cause when the economy improves. We’d also like to see the state free up money to address ballooning class sizes that undermine the efforts of even the best teachers.

But these are mostly quibbles. Bennett’s on the right track. Hoosiers should not accept mediocrity or worse from their schools. Bennett is making the most aggressive push to improve Indiana’s education system since the A-Plus reforms passed in 1987 under then-Superintendent of Public Instruction H. Dean Evans. It’s about time.•


To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.