EDITORIAL: State education chief's agenda gets good grades

 IBJ Staff
August 28, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Tony Bennett, the state’s superintendent of public instruction for nearly two years, deserves accolades for shoving education reform toward the top of Indiana’s agenda.

Unlike his predecessor, Suellen Reed, who seemed little more than a cheerleader for schools, Bennett is pushing hard-nosed reforms.

And while at times he’s unfairly cast the state’s powerful teachers’ union—the Indiana State Teachers Association—as a villain, Bennett wisely struck a more productive, collaborative tone during his State of Education address Aug. 23. The New Albany Republican avoided the rhetoric that scores political points but does little to actually improve schools.

To be sure, he championed one of his biggest issues—the need to tie teacher promotion and recognition to student performance. He criticized the current system that rewards teachers financially solely on the number of years they teach and the degrees they hold.

But he also acknowledged that the problems of the worst schools go deeper than the teachers in the classrooms. The problem also is a leadership void in the principal’s office.

Bennett said administrators he met with in districts with some of the lowest-performing schools reported that as many as three-fourths of their teachers were ineffective.

“More shocking to me is that some building administrators have failed to conduct rigorous annual examinations to identify ineffective teachers, or they have failed to take appropriate actions when teachers are found ineffective,” he said.

At another point in the speech, he added, “More than any other reform ... we must focus our efforts on the only factors proven to make a big impact on student achievement: great teachers and great school leadership.”

We’re all for accountability, and we like Bennett’s efforts to begin grading schools on an easy-to-understand A through F scale. Our reservations are all about execution and methodology. Students are not widgets, and test scores—while important—shouldn’t be the sole measure of a school’s effectiveness.

Similarly, we applaud Bennett’s commitment to expecting more of schools with large numbers of low-income and minority students—groups that have historically underperformed. But the new grading system must factor in the additional challenges schools serving those populations face. Often, by the time children from impoverished families enter first grade, they’re already woefully behind peers.

Bennett rightfully points out that throwing money at schools is not the solution. But wise investments in the right areas can help. During his 60-minute address, Bennett didn’t say a word about universal full-day kindergarten—which would have a huge, positive impact on the state’s most at-risk kids. We’d like to see him champion that costly cause when the economy improves. We’d also like to see the state free up money to address ballooning class sizes that undermine the efforts of even the best teachers.

But these are mostly quibbles. Bennett’s on the right track. Hoosiers should not accept mediocrity or worse from their schools. Bennett is making the most aggressive push to improve Indiana’s education system since the A-Plus reforms passed in 1987 under then-Superintendent of Public Instruction H. Dean Evans. It’s about time.•


To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............