IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Township reform must not fail again

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Editorial

How the view has changed since January. Back then, it appeared this finally would be the year for local government reform. After all, Gov. Mitch Daniels touted it as one of his legislative priorities in his State of the State address. And Republicans control both chambers of the Legislature for the first time in five years.

“Some of the changes are so obvious that our failure to make them is a daily embarrassment,” Daniels said.

We agree.

“Today, over 4,000 politicians, few of them known to the voters they represent, run over 1,000 township governments. … Some have eight years of spending needs stashed in the bank, yet they keep collecting taxes.”

Despite the absurdity of the situation Daniels described, legislative efforts at statewide township reform have crumbled again this year. But there is still hope for Marion County. Senate Bill 246 would eliminate township boards and assign most township duties to Marion County government.

The bill is not perfect. For example, a provision to consolidate the three remaining township fire departments into the Indianapolis Fire Department unfortunately was stripped out.

Still, it’s another step down the road to improving the efficiency and transparency of local government. With property tax caps putting the squeeze on budgets, it’s foolhardy for townships to be sitting on millions that could be funding needed services. The Indiana Department of Local Government Finance has said Marion County townships spend $1.32 for every dollar in services they provide. We cannot afford such ridiculous overhead expenses.

SB 246 on April 19 gained bipartisan support when Democratic Rep. Maryann Sullivan, of Indianapolis, signed on as a sponsor of the bill, which was authored by Republican Sen. Jim Merritt, also of Indianapolis.

We take that as a sign the General Assembly is finally serious about streamlining local government, at least in this one important county. Township governance has outlived its usefulness. The time for reform is now.

Death of a preservationist

Bill Cook was a lot of things: an entrepreneur, a leader, a healer, a philanthropist. But his legacy as a preservationist is perhaps more important, because it is so rare.

Back in 1960, business leaders such as Eli Lilly and Herman Krannert founded the statewide preservation organization known today as Indiana Landmarks.

What prominent businesspeople today are leading the effort to protect our architecture, aside from the occasional CEO willing to write a check and slap his company’s name on a building? Cook, founder of Bloomington-based medical-device giant Cook Group, restored some of our state’s most treasured places not just with his wallet, but with sweat, and heart.

The West Baden Springs Hotel in French Lick and, more recently, the Old Centrum on Central Avenue are among the 57 historic Indiana structures that Cook and his wife are credited with saving. When he died April 15, he left the state much in his debt.

To Cook, preserving buildings meant preserving communities and promoting economic vitality. Indiana could use more of that, and more people like Bill Cook. We hope to see other business leaders, inspired by his vision and dedication, step in to build on his legacy.•

__________

To comment on these editorials, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT