IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Township reform must not fail again

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Editorial

How the view has changed since January. Back then, it appeared this finally would be the year for local government reform. After all, Gov. Mitch Daniels touted it as one of his legislative priorities in his State of the State address. And Republicans control both chambers of the Legislature for the first time in five years.

“Some of the changes are so obvious that our failure to make them is a daily embarrassment,” Daniels said.

We agree.

“Today, over 4,000 politicians, few of them known to the voters they represent, run over 1,000 township governments. … Some have eight years of spending needs stashed in the bank, yet they keep collecting taxes.”

Despite the absurdity of the situation Daniels described, legislative efforts at statewide township reform have crumbled again this year. But there is still hope for Marion County. Senate Bill 246 would eliminate township boards and assign most township duties to Marion County government.

The bill is not perfect. For example, a provision to consolidate the three remaining township fire departments into the Indianapolis Fire Department unfortunately was stripped out.

Still, it’s another step down the road to improving the efficiency and transparency of local government. With property tax caps putting the squeeze on budgets, it’s foolhardy for townships to be sitting on millions that could be funding needed services. The Indiana Department of Local Government Finance has said Marion County townships spend $1.32 for every dollar in services they provide. We cannot afford such ridiculous overhead expenses.

SB 246 on April 19 gained bipartisan support when Democratic Rep. Maryann Sullivan, of Indianapolis, signed on as a sponsor of the bill, which was authored by Republican Sen. Jim Merritt, also of Indianapolis.

We take that as a sign the General Assembly is finally serious about streamlining local government, at least in this one important county. Township governance has outlived its usefulness. The time for reform is now.

Death of a preservationist

Bill Cook was a lot of things: an entrepreneur, a leader, a healer, a philanthropist. But his legacy as a preservationist is perhaps more important, because it is so rare.

Back in 1960, business leaders such as Eli Lilly and Herman Krannert founded the statewide preservation organization known today as Indiana Landmarks.

What prominent businesspeople today are leading the effort to protect our architecture, aside from the occasional CEO willing to write a check and slap his company’s name on a building? Cook, founder of Bloomington-based medical-device giant Cook Group, restored some of our state’s most treasured places not just with his wallet, but with sweat, and heart.

The West Baden Springs Hotel in French Lick and, more recently, the Old Centrum on Central Avenue are among the 57 historic Indiana structures that Cook and his wife are credited with saving. When he died April 15, he left the state much in his debt.

To Cook, preserving buildings meant preserving communities and promoting economic vitality. Indiana could use more of that, and more people like Bill Cook. We hope to see other business leaders, inspired by his vision and dedication, step in to build on his legacy.•

__________

To comment on these editorials, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT