IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Where next for mass transit in Indianapolis?

 IBJ Staff
May 11, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Frustration on the part of mass transit proponents was palpable last month when the Indiana Senate shunted the matter to a summer study committee after the House had approved a bill with strong bipartisan support.

Advocates for expanding transit in Marion and Hamilton counties had made their case. Solidly. For years. And the issue had been studied to death. What possible good could come from further study?

The committee, some concluded, must be a stalling tactic.

Well, possibly. Or the handful of Senate Republican holdouts need further convincing. Transit actually stands a reasonably good chance in the 2014 session if supporters play their cards right this summer.

Proponents can start by toning down the condescension. The skeptics might not be aware of the “CAVE people”—Citizens Against Virtually Everything—derision, but they certainly feel the disdain and, human nature being what it is, are apt to dig in their heels. The holdouts mainly have philosophical differences. They think money is better invested in roads or have questions about the way transit would be funded.

Proponents should take the skeptics at their word that they’re open to the facts and show up at the committee meetings prepared to respectfully and patiently reiterate what they’ve touted all along:

• Transit moves workers to jobs and health care.

• Transit stations spark real estate development.

• Fewer cars on streets and highways mean less need for expensive streets and highways.

• Young people expect competent transit. Growth-minded cities ignore this at their peril.

• The state isn’t obligated to pick up the pieces if the system doesn’t pay for itself.

• Allowing a referendum isn’t the same as raising taxes. A vote for transit simply allows citizens of Marion and Hamilton counties to vote whether they want to increase their taxes to expand transit.

• Locals can be trusted to handle transit details.

• Other counties would opt in to the system only if they wish.

Proponents also should dust off a 2008 Indiana Department of Transportation study that concluded transit was needed and feasible.

Supporters moreover should be sensitive to Indy fatigue. Lawmakers outside the area have been asked to delve into funding for Lucas Oil Stadium, Indianapolis Motor Speedway and more.

Lawmakers should be reminded that Hoosiers are not given to wasting tax dollars. Indianapolis-area leaders have repeatedly shown they can leverage a tax dollar into private development, and if anyone in government can put transit money to good use, it’s them.

Expanding transit is still a good idea. The skeptics can and should be brought around.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Throwing Good Money after Bad
    Expanding transit is a good idea. Giving more money to existing transit authorities, however, seems unwise. We have a rideshare program that has attracted barely three-tenths of 1% of the local community. We have a bus system with on-time rates as low as 60%. Both services have difficult-to-use websites. How does this level of management deserve more money? Of course, we need transit. The referendum is fine, since it just gives people the ability to vote on transit later. But it ignores the fundamental question: do we have competent transit managers today? I'm hoping that we do, but I fear that we don't. More at: http://www.nuvo.net/GuestVoices/archives/2013/03/29/im-not-so-sure-about-the-transit-plan
  • Low Density
    The best way to get people on board for transit is to start removing lanes from I465, I65, and I70 through the city. Create more bike lanes and reduce city streets to as few lanes as possible. As it is, Indy is far too easy to get around, even at rush hour. You can get from Carmel to downtown in about 25 minutes. The density is not nearly high enough to support transit. If you have to drive from your house, to the station, then wait for the train, pay more money to ride, then transfer to a bus.... Are the vast majority of people going to still need cars to get to the transit? How are people going to get from all the neighborhoods to the stations? If I still have to pay for a car, and I have to pay to ride the transit, and it takes longer than driving, what is the appeal? It seems like all the proponents say look at all these other cities that have transit, we better get it too lest we be passed by! When you actually look at how well laid out Indy is, and how spread out Indy is, I don't understand why people want a bunch of empty trains and buses being paid for with tax increases.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Hello Dear Are you tired of Seeking Loans and Mortgages,have you Been Turned down constantly By your banks and Other Financial Institutions or Micro Finance scheme. This is let you know with 100% guarantee that we Offer loans ranging from $1,000 Minimum to $1,000,000.00 Maximum at 3% interest rate per Month. We give out LOANS for developing business. a competitive edge/business expansion. email address: michealscottloan124@gmail.com We offer the following kinds of loans and many more; * Personal Loans ( Unsecured Loan) * Business Loans ( Unsecured Loan) * Consolidation Loan * Combination Loan * Home Improvement * Xmas Loans for contact to seek for loan email this email address: michealscottloan124@gmail.com Thanks

  2. My name is Mr Henry Josh and i live in the USA California and life is worth living right now for me and my family and all this is because of one man sent by GOD to help me and my family, i once had a life filled with sorrow because my first SON needed a kidney transplant and all our savings were going towards his medications and this normally leaves us with no money to pay our bills or even put enough food on our table and our rent was due and no funds to pay these bills and life felt so unfair to me and every night my wife will cry herself to sleep every night until one day, i was browsing through yahoo answers and i saw a striking advert of a man that gives out personal loans and that the offer is opened to all and i have heard so many things about internet scams but at this point of my life, i was very desperate and ready to take any risk and at the end of the day, i applied for this loan and from one step to another, i got my loan within 12 hours through bank transfer and you know, it was all like a dream and i called Mr Daniel Jones A Man who is the GOD sent lender i found and said, i have received my loan and he smiled stating that to GOD be the glory and i was so shocked as i have never ever seen anyone with such a GOD fearing and kind heart and today, i am the happiest man on earth because by GOD’S grace, my SON kidney transplant was successful and today he is healthy, i and my family are living very comfortable and happy and if you are in my former situation or in serious and legitimate need of a loan, you can reach this GOD sent lender via fidelityloanfirm@outlook.com

  3. Greetings to everyone reading this comment!!! I am Greg William by name. I am out here to recommend the effort of Mark Oscar,I was in need of a consolidation loan amount of 50,000 and as soon as I got in contact with Mark Oscar Loan Firm on Wednesday last week and on Friday last week as well I receive an alert from my bank(Royal Bank of Scotland Group) that the fund was transferred,I want everybody on this site to contact Mark Oscar now via email on how to get a loan because I got my loan from them and I am very happy,so contact them now. Oscarloanfinance@hotmail.com Thanks!!!!!!

  4. Elected officials, like Mourdock, get vested in 8 years. It takes 10 years for all other public employees, most of whom make a lot less money. So much for the promise to finish out his term.

  5. Great state treasurer and a good man!! Just curious if the folks who didn't quite understand his quote would like to tell my daughter-in-law that God didn't intend her! Mourdock's comment was correct but twisted and the article didn't mention that his opponent and the press let the impression stand that Mourdock meant that the rape was intended. Stupid people!!

ADVERTISEMENT