IBJNews

Grocery, housing projects could rejuvenate stretch of 16th Street

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A troubled low-income housing project called Caravelle Commons has a new owner with plans to redevelop the complex to better connect with the Herron Morton Place neighborhood.

Next door, the grocery chain Kroger has revived efforts to acquire land and plan a new supermarket at 16th and Central Avenue to replace a cramped, old-format location. The chain bought the corner a few years ago, closed on a vacant parcel that was previously part of Caravelle earlier this year, and is negotiating with the owner of another vacant lot.

Together, the developments could represent a turning point for a blighted stretch of 16th Street that has bedeviled the surrounding neighborhood for years. Community groups aren’t getting hopes up just yet; talk of redevelopment along the stretch has been buzzing for at least a decade.

But they are encouraged by plans to either drastically revamp or replace the 65-unit Caravelle, which sits on about seven acres north of 16th Street between Central and College avenues.

The Indianapolis Housing Agency bought the complex in March from the Near North Development Corp., which took over the failed co-op in 2003. Near North stepped in to refinance, renovate and stabilize the property with an eye toward eventually selling it to a more appropriate owner, said Michael Osborne, the group’s president.

Demolition likely

The 1970s suburban-style complex sits in the middle of a historic urban neighborhood and invites crime with its dead-end streets and fenced-in apartment homes that surround crowded parking lots.

The housing agency, which administers the federal Section 8 program, used a grant of about

$400,000 from a city housing trust fund to acquire the property and begin drawing up plans for redevelopment. The agency already has won stimulus grants it expects to apply to the project’s cost and also plans to apply for low-income housing tax credits. The group declined to provide an estimate of the project’s ultimate cost.

At a minimum, the Indianapolis Housing Agency plans to reopen Park Avenue, which now dead-ends in the complex, and take down fences that surround the apartment buildings.

But there’s a “good chance” the plans will involve demolition of the existing complex, at 1643 N. Park Ave., and the construction of a more urban-looking replacement, said Bruce Baird, the group’s director of strategic planning and development.

“We don’t like the layout—it’s very nonurban,” Baird said. “It’s a typical 1970s urban renewal project that doesn’t fit within the neighborhood at all.”

The agency would like to rebuild the apartments on an expanded footprint; it just bought a boarded-up home adjacent to the existing complex and is talking with city officials about taking over a city-owned parcel at the northeast corner of 16th Street and Park Avenue that would be ideal for a mixed-use building, Baird said.

Neighbors are eager for improvements they see as long overdue.

“We are dying for something to happen there. We are waiting with bated breath,” said Kellie Welborn, a board member of Herron Morton Neighborhood Association.

Welborn said her group wants to improve the neighborhood for all residents, including those of Caravelle.

The housing agency hopes to hold on to current residents of the complex, which now is 100-percent occupied. The group has promised the neighborhood an update on its progress in December.

Grocery coveted

Neighbors are so eager for a full-service grocery store that they briefly considered boycotting the existing, 22,000-square-foot Kroger before deciding that visiting frequently could be more persuasive, Welborn said. One worry for some: the impact on the neighborhood of a potential Kroger fuel station.

Kroger already owns about an acre at the northeast corner of 16th Street and Central Avenue and has an option to buy another parcel to the north from the King Park Area Development Corp. It bought a vacant portion of the Caravelle property behind its existing store, and the chain also recently opened negotiations with the owner of a vacant lot at 1625 Central Ave. that’s listed for $49,900.

“There’s been talk of a Kroger going in there for eight years,” said Mark Jones, whose locally based Copasetic Investments bought the lot from a bank about 18 months ago. “I think it would be a savvy move on Kroger’s part. There’s not a newer grocery store in the area, and with all the growth I’d say there’s a need.”

Kroger spokesman John Elliott said the chain has had trouble acquiring all the real estate it would need for a new store but hasn’t given up. The chain is in an “expansion and investment mode” in Indianapolis; it just opened a new store at 71st Street and Binford Boulevard, is building another in Nora and a third is in the works for West Carmel.

Workers last week were installing new fixtures in the produce section and doing other work to spruce up the 16th Street store. Kroger will monitor whether that investment provides a boost to sales before it decides how to proceed, Elliott said.  

A few properties could prove pivotal to a potential new Kroger store: A row of three boarded-up and graffiti-covered 1930s apartment buildings that occupy a large lot between Central Avenue and the existing store. Two of the buildings are owned by local investors John Sherby and Steve Blankenship of S&B Investments and a third is owned by an affiliate of Countrywide Mortgage.

S&B had hoped to acquire all three for a redevelopment but couldn’t secure financing to buy the last one, so the company is offering its buildings for sale at $49,917 each, said Stacy Sheedy, the registered agent for the company.

“He would be more than happy to sell to Kroger if he could,” she said of one of the two owners.

The third building could be tougher to acquire: It is saddled with more than $100,000 in liens, more than the building likely is worth.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

ADVERTISEMENT