IBJNews

Emmis’ quarterly profit rises on sale of station

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Emmis Communications Corp. reported a big profit in its latest quarter thanks to the sale of a radio station in Los Angeles.

The Indianapolis-based media company said Thursday morning that it earned $38.1 million, or 98 cents per share, in the fiscal second quarter ended Aug. 31 compared with a loss of $8.6 million, or 22 cents per share, in the year-ago period.

Much of Emmis’ profit stemmed from the Aug. 23 sale of KXOS-FM in Los Angeles for $85.5 million, from which the company reported a gain from discontinued operations of $32.8 million.

Revenue fell 6.2 percent to $57.6 percent.

Emmis attributed the revenue decline to the September 2011 sale of its portion of Merlin Media LLC to a private-equity firm for $120 million. The stations are not considered discontinued operations because Emmis still retains a non-controlling equity ownership stake in them.

Excluding the sale, radio revenue would have increased $600,000, or 1.6 percent, in the second quarter, Emmis said.

“We continue to take steps to improve our balance sheet,” CEO Jeff Smulyan said in a note to employees. “We are actively pursuing a refinancing of our entire capital structure that will dramatically reduce our interest expense and increase our free cash flow going forward.”

Total radio revenue for the quarter fell 7.6 percent to $44.6 million. Revenue from publishing operations dipped nearly 1 percent, to $13 million.

“While the picture is dramatically improved over just a year ago, I want to be clear that we must be vigilant and continue to keep a tight rein on costs,” Smulyan wrote in his note. “We don’t want to increase expenses when the industries we are in are only growing slightly.”

Emmis owns 18 radio stations nationwide, and six city and specialty magazines. Locally, it operates WFNI-AM 1070, WIBC-FM 93.1, WLHK-FM 97.1 and WYXB-FM 105.7, as well as Indianapolis Monthly magazine.

Company shares opened trading Thursday morning at $2.08, down from their 52-week high of $2.57 in late August.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT