IBJNews

Entrepreneur says quality of venture capital as important as quantity

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Jim Pearson knows a thing or two about raising money from venture capitalists. And he has some advice for BioCrossroads: Teach entrepreneurs the value of money.

Pearson was CEO of locally based medical-device maker Suros Surgical Systems Inc., one of the fastest-growing companies in Indianapolis history. Just six years after starting that company, which makes a system for automated breast biopsies, he sold it for $248 million.

Pearson

Today, Pearson leads another fast-growing medical-device startup, NICO Corp., which raised $10 million in 2009’s third quarter. NICO makes a promising machine for minimally invasive brain surgery.

Neither Suros nor NICO ever received any venture capital from BioCrossroads’ $73 million Indiana Future Fund in 2003 or its $58 million successor, INext, formed last month. Even so, Pearson is a big supporter. He said BioCrossroads’ fund raising has definitely made life easier for every local life sciences entrepreneur who’s looking for funding. So have the increased efforts of just about every major local life sciences firm, from Eli Lilly and Co. to Clarian Health, Pearson said.

“Indiana’s come a long way, and it’s a lot easier now to raise money,” he said. “That doesn’t mean it’s easy.”

Most observers focus on the quantity of venture capital available and raised periodically in Indiana. And while that’s important, Pearson said he’s learned through hard experience that the quality of that money is just as important.

To be successful, he said, life sciences entrepreneurs—many of whom are scientists unfamiliar with high finance—must learn when to accept venture capital and when to turn it down. Otherwise, they can quickly lose control of their companies.

“It’s like that old saying, ‘You name the price and I get to name the terms,’” Pearson said. “Most people say, ‘I need money,’ and they should say, ‘I’m looking for this type of money.’ Early entrepreneurs don’t know the difference.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT