EPA official: Carbon rules built on methods in use

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A top official from the Environmental Protection Agency told utility regulators from 14 states Wednesday that its new plan to target global warming by cutting power plants' carbon dioxide emissions is based on methods already in place across the nation, and not on untested technologies or ideas.

The agency's strategy is built around four existing approaches, including energy-efficiency programs and adoption of renewable energy such as wind or solar power, that states can use to come into compliance with the new carbon-cutting standard, said Janet McCabe, acting assistant administrator for the EPA's Office of Air and Radiation.

"This rule is absolutely built on the things that states, cities and utilities are already doing. This is not seeking to identify innovative, yet-to-be implemented or deployed types of technologies," she told members of the Mid-America Regulatory Conference.

McCabe told the group of utility and energy regulatory agencies from 14 states from Texas to Minnesota that all states will have the flexibility to tailor their carbon-reduction plans based on their strengths and move forward either solo or by joining with other states.

The new standard seeks to implement a 30 percent cut in U.S. carbon dioxide emissions by the year 2030 from 2005 levels. States have until June 2016 to submit plans for meeting their specific carbon reductions.

Michigan, which would be required to reduce its carbon output by 31.5 percent under the plan, might want to consider joining with other states for a regional approach to meeting the rule, said Greg White, a commissioner with the Michigan Public Service Commission.

But White said he's concerned Michigan might not be able to meet the June 2016 deadline if it opted to join other states in seeking what could hold a lower-cost option of compliance.

"That would require significant negotiations and they're not going to get done in a year, so we're very concerned about having enough time to meet that deadline," he said.

The EPA's plan, however, gives states the ability to seek a one-year deadline extension, while states that join with other states to draft multi-state plans can request a 2-year extension.

Doug Scott, chairman of the Illinois Commerce Commission, said the new EPA rules are very complex, running more than 600 pages, and it will take states, regulators and utilities time to digest them and figure out a compliance approach.

"It's very complicated. It's a whole other language," he said.

McCabe said the EPA's new draft rule doesn't just aim to curtail emissions of carbon dioxide — a greenhouse gas blamed for contributing to global warming — but would also significantly improve public health by reducing emissions of sulfur dioxide, particulate matter and nitrogen oxide by hundreds of thousands of tons.

"This will bring immediate and local and regional health benefits to everybody in the country. That's a very important benefit we shouldn't lose sight of," she said.

McCabe said that if states fail to comply with the carbon reduction, the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to "come forward and do it for the state."

Under the plan, Indiana would have to curb its carbon emissions by 20 percent. Gov. Mike Pence has vowed to oppose the regulations, saying they would cost the state jobs and business growth and result in higher electricity rates. Pence spokeswoman Christy Denault said Wednesday the governor is considering a range of possible approaches to fighting the rule, including a possible lawsuits.

"We'll pursue all possible methods of pushing back against this and that may possibly include legal action, but we're looking at all our options," she said.


  • Higher taxes for subsidies
    We will just need more subsidies to help all those that this law was to help. You all know what subsidies are right? They are higher taxes for those who pay taxes - middle class, to pay for those who don't pay taxes. With Obama's and the dems economy the rate of those who don't pay taxes has skyrocketed and the middle class has shrunk at an alarming rate.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. This is still my favorite Mexican restaurant in town. What I do love about the new version is it is much quieter than the most recent version. TV's were off, the music wasn't too loud, and the wait staff were not hyperactive like they had been the past few times I had been there. I just wish they would bring back the MOLE for the enchiladas!

  2. Not a bad paper. There is a need for local community news and city government issues. Don't really need the owner's constant national political rants. We all know where they stand by now.

  3. What nice people. Menard should've known better than to team up with the guy who robbed and drove Conseco to ashes. I'm surprised Timothy Durham isn't involved in this.

  4. Hello, I am Maris Peters, currently living in Texas city, USA. I am a widow at the moment with three kids and i was stuck in a financial situation in August 2014 and i needed to refinance and pay my bills. I tried seeking loans from various loan Companies both private and corporate but never with success, and most banks declined my credit. But as God would have it, I was introduced to a Man of God a private loan lender who gave me a loan of $65,000USD and today am a business owner and my kids are doing well at the moment, if you must contact any firm or company with reference to securing a loan without collateral , no credit check, no co signer with just 2% interest rate and better repayment plans and schedule, please contact Mr William David. He doesn’t know that am doing this but am so happy now and i decided to let people know more about him and also i want God to bless him more.You can contact him through his email: Davidloanfirm@yahoo.com

  5. It is beyond me how anyone can think this was a "bad deal" for the state! If they could take the money back then, yes, but they can't! Protections were built in the agreement. Now, if they roll the roads up and take them away, I will agree that it was a bad deal. Otherwise, the only way to have paid for the infrastructure that was badly needed was for the state to issue bonds....that is a four letter synonym for debt folks!!