Ex-Countrymark CEO again seeking early release

Scott Olson
August 30, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Former Countrymark CEO David Swanson has succeeded in getting a federal appeals court to hear his case for early release and is asking to be let out of prison until the court rules on the appeal.

The 68-year-old former financial executive is serving a 12-year sentence stemming from his 2002 conviction for wire fraud, money laundering and tax evasion.

Swanson argued during a March hearing in Indianapolis that the government failed to disclose evidence favorable to him and that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel.

But, in a May ruling, Judge Sarah Evans Barker picked apart Swanson’s arguments, including a claim that his attorneys—James Voyles and Jennifer Lukemeyer—were derelict in not seeking a mistrial after the government presented its case.

A federal appeals court in Chicago, however, has agreed to hear his appeal of Barker’s ruling the week of Sept. 26.

Swanson’s lawyers argue that he should be released from prison pending the appeal because, if successful, he already has served a sentence beyond what would have been appropriate.

They said in their Aug. 18 petition for his release that he should have served no more than eight years and one month had his previous counsel effectively defended him.

Factoring in credit for good behavior, which his lawyers say he is entitled to, he has served considerably longer than that.

“As the court knows, he did not appear for his original sentencing over eight years ago, a serious mistake, as he has already acknowledged,” his lawyer, Carol Brook of the Federal Defender Program in Chicago, said in a court filing. “And the intervening eight years demonstrate that he is not a flight risk.”

However, in opposing Swanson’s motion for release, federal prosecutors insist he is a flight risk and that he is unlikely to prevail on his appeal.

A jury found Swanson guilty in October 2002 of stealing $2.7 million from Countrymark, an Indianapolis-based agricultural cooperative, in the 1990s.

He failed to appear for sentencing in January 2003 and was apprehended in Seattle about three weeks later.

“Should Swanson not prevail on appeal, and the United States does not believe he will, he will face the choice of absconding or returning to prison,” U.S. Attorney Joseph H. Hogsett said in the government’s objection filed on Thursday. “Given Swanson’s record, the odds of his making the right decision are not promising.”

Swanson has indicated in court filings that if his request is granted, and if his appeal is successful, he will go to New York.

He is serving his sentence at a Duluth, Minn., federal prison.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!