IBJNews

Fair Finance investors object to Brizzi settlement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A group of Fair Finance Co. investors are objecting to a settlement the company’s bankruptcy trustee reached with former Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi, arguing that the deal might extricate Brizzi from lawsuits they’ve filed against him.

Under the deal filed Nov. 21 in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Akron, Ohio, Brizzi agreed to pay the trustee $195,881—by far the largest settlement with a politician who received campaign contributions from Fair Finance’s CEO, indicted Indianapolis financier Tim Durham.

But an attorney for the investors on Thursday filed an objection to the settlement, charging that Trustee Brian Bash’s proposed compromise with Brizzi, a former director of Fair Finance, could prevent them from “having their day in court.”

To recover their lost investments, the group has filed claims against Fair Finance and its affiliated entities, as well as various officers and directors, including Brizzi, for violations of Ohio securities laws.

The trustee since early 2010 has been trying to recover money for Fair Finance’s investors—Ohio residents who purchased unsecured certificates with interest rates as high as 9.5 percent. Bash alleges Durham “utterly looted” Akron-based Fair after buying it in 2002, stripping the business of the financial wherewithal to repay more than 5,000 investors who are owed more than $200 million.

The lawsuits the investors have filed against Brizzi are separate from the settlement agreement, a point their lawyer emphasizes in the objection in which the investors are referred to as the “Wayne County litigants.”

“The broad language in [Bash’s] proposed settlement agreement could be construed to release [Brizzi] from all claims, including the Wayne County litigants’ claims,” their lawyer wrote in the objection. “This would prevent the Wayne County litigants from having their day in court with respect to their claims against Brizzi for his role in the sale of the Fair Finance investment certificates and his role as a director of Fair Finance.”

The investors argue that Bash lacks the authority to release Brizzi from pending litigation and that doing so would be unfair because the proposed settlement does not require Brizzi to compensate any investors for his alleged liability as a director of Fair Finance.

Bash’s settlement with Brizzi calls for the Brizzi for Prosecutor Committee to repay all $170,881 donated by Durham, Fair Finance and affiliated companies.

In addition, Bash alleged that Fair Finance and Durham provided Brizzi with personal loans and financial assistance totaling $55,735 for trips and miscellaneous expenses. Brizzi disputed the amount, according to the settlement, but agreed to pay $25,000.

Brizzi didn’t seek re-election in 2010 following criticism over his ties to Durham, a friend who served as his 2006 campaign finance chairman. Brizzi now is in private law practice.

Durham and two business partners, James Cochran and Rick Snow, were arrested in March after being indicted on 12 felony counts, including conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud. They deny wrongdoing.

More of IBJ's coverage of Durham and Fair Finance can be found here.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Who Is The Crook?
    Who is the Crook- or are they All Crooks?
    Wearing a Tie (or Not)- these guys all stink like a four-day old dead fish.
  • Shame
    Carl Brizzi is a thug, that's right "thug" the only difference is he wears a suit and tie. He and Charlie White should both be serving time with Plowman.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The Fringe! Plus, the simple fact that there are so many local faves in such close proximity to each other.

  2. I remenber, watching the toll road, being built, through South Bend, when I was 10 years old. I believe, back then that it was estimated, that the toll road, would be paid for in 20 years and then it would be free. I am now 71, what happened? Since the power is in the people, by that, I mean that, we the people are in total control of everything. I, suggest that no one ever use the toll road again, let it go broke. We the people can control the price of everything, from groceries to gas, if we would just do it. If we don't pay the asking price, the sellers will lower the price and if we wait awhile, they will lower the price to what we accept as reasonable. I would like to know why a highway like interstate 94, is so well maintained, a much better highway, than the toll road, but has no tolls. I would also like to know why, a sitting governor, with a term limit, maximum of eight years, can lease, public property, for 75 years. Even though I have transponders in both of my trucks and will not be affected by the increase, I have been and will contine to avoid using the toll road. I make many trips from northern Indiana to Chicago, every year, and I prefer the better highway, I94!

  3. Coming from her background,she should be used to those kinds of advances! Menard probably figured it was ok to tuck a buck!

  4. I'm still waiting for the list of available, high quality apartments in the Village.

  5. This criminal masquerading as a lawyer obviously has serious issues. He’s been proven by his own testimony to be a pathological liar and probably has a personality disorder as he seems to be constructing a reality around himself. He places no value on truth, honesty or loyalty as evidenced by what he has done to his clients and his own family. And by the demands and lies he has made in court, it is evident he feels entitled to do and say whatever suits his purpose and everyone else is expected to nod obediently and believe him because he is, after all, Bill Super Lawyer; or BS lawyer for short. This millionaire wanna-be no longer owns anything of value; he squandered it and put everything he had into foreclosure. He has no money, house, car, boat or vacation home left to show for what he earned or what he stole. He’s just another loser without morals who will be doing time. I’m certain all of his courtroom shenanigans are antagonizing his poor victims. As Lamar said, his behavior and claims in court have been outrageous. The judge needs to be more than concerned; he needs to be judicial and end this nonsense.

ADVERTISEMENT