Federal insurance enrollment up 36 percent in Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Nearly 65,000 Indiana residents have signed up for private insurance under the federal health care law, but the number is still far short of initial projections as the open enrollment deadline nears.

Federal officials said Tuesday that 64,972 Indiana residents had signed up as of March 1. That's an increase of about 17,700, or 36 percent, from the previous month, but is well short of the 100,000 people originally expected to have signed up during the first five months of enrollment.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has estimated 125,000 Indiana residents will enroll by the March 31 deadline.

The data show more women than men have signed up. More than a third of Indiana enrollees are ages 55 to 64.

About 900,000 Indiana residents lack health insurance.


  • affordable?
    Affordable health insurance?? Go ahead and get on healthcare.gov and follow the prompts, plug in your info, and look at the rates and the plans. Two things jump out; if you don't qualify for a subsidy, the rates are far from affordable (and note the deductibles!) and if you do get the subsidy, who do you thnk is paying it? Quite simply, the ACA is simply not a sustainable plan.
  • GOP
    Sign more people up under Medicaid with the same amount of tax payer dollars available to pay for it. Therefore, the 10 cents on the dollar doctors and hospitals receive for Medicaid is reduced even further. Not against helping out the poor but simply expanding Medicaid is fiscally irresponsible for the well-being of the State. There have to be other alternatives or maybe a combination from which to work...
  • Thank you
    Thank you Markus. you describe the uncaring attitude of our "republican" polititions to a tee. Sad.
  • It could be higher
    If the Indiana GOP wasn't adamantly opposed to people getting health insurance even more Hoosiers would have it. GOP is perfectly happy to see people in pain. They don't care one bit if that person is too poor to afford the care they need.
    • How Many
      How many of those people who have signed up under the law were actually perviously uninsured? Or, are these people choosing to leave their employer sponsored plan for the marketplace???

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

    2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

    3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    4. If you only knew....

    5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.