IBJNews

Fever exec 'confident' about team's future

Scott Olson
October 7, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As the Indiana Fever prepare for  Wednesday night's WNBA championship game, an executive with the team's parent organization is optimistic the women’s basketball squad will remain in Indianapolis.

Rick Fuson, executive vice president of Pacers Sports & Entertainment, which owns the Fever, said he is “very confident” about the team’s future in the city, though he declined to comment further.

“Right now, we just want to make sure these ladies have everything they need today to win the championship,” he said.

The Fever host the Phoenix Mercury Wednesday night at Conseco Fieldhouse and are one game away from winning the championship.

Now in its 10th season, the Fever have never been profitable. Team owner Herb Simon, who also owns the Indiana Pacers, has said this is a critical year in evaluating the franchise and its long-term viability here.

If ticket and merchandising sales are any indication, a recent surge in fan support may be enough to indeed secure the team’s future.

The sellout crowd at Sunday’s game against Phoenix nearly doubled the 9,210 who attended the first playoff game against the Washington Mystics. A few tickets still remain for tonight’s game, but Fuson expects a sellout as well.

Season ticket sales for the Fever stood at about 2,500 at the beginning of the season. Fuson declined to say whether the playoff push has resulted in additional sales but acknowledged that the team is seeing “positive interest.”

Fans also are showing their support by purchasing Fever merchandise. The team sold 800 T-shirts Sunday from its store and souvenir stands within the fieldhouse. On a normal game night, the team might peddle 100, said Gary Nelson, director of merchandising.

Nelson purchased an additional inventory of T-shirts for the playoffs and bought even more for tonight’s game, in anticipation of a championship.

“We’re ready to rock and roll tonight,” he said.

Fuson, who has been with the Pacers organization for 25 years, saw the men's team come close to an NBA title when it lost to the Los Angeles Lakers in the 2000 finals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT