Fishers looking to fund development with tax hike

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The clock is ticking on Fishers’ proposal to impose a 1-percent food-and-beverage tax to fund economic development in the fast-growing suburb.

State lawmakers agreed earlier this year to allow the town to collect the extra penny as it works to reinvent its uninspiring downtown, but officials must pull the trigger on the tax hike by Dec. 31.

Town Council President John Weingardt said it’s far from a done deal, even though local leaders asked the Legislature to authorize the move.

“It is important that we as a council step back and let the public tell us what they want,” he said. “We still have to represent our constituents.”
fishers_table.gif To that end, two public hearings are scheduled before the council’s December vote: Residents and business owners can share their thoughts Nov. 12 at a special meeting or Nov. 18 during a regular council confab. All correspondence and phone messages also will be shared with members.

Although raising taxes is rarely a popular idea, Fishers is embarking on an ambitious—and expensive—downtown redevelopment plan intended to spur commercial investment in the community.

The town turned over publicly owned land and agreed to pay for a parking garage at The Depot, a $42 million mixed-use project now being built along 116th Street, for example, and its redevelopment commission has been buying and bundling private property to make it more attractive to developers.

Officials also are working on several other projects expected to bring businesses (and their employees) to the town center, but no details have been made public during the talks.

“It’s a timing issue. These deals run at their own speed,” said Weingardt, who told IBJ in May that the tax-hike might be difficult to approve without “an economic development deal to hang it on.”

An announcement could come soon. The town’s Economic Development Commission and Redevelopment Commission each held executive sessions Nov. 5, justifying the closed meetings because they were negotiating with corporate prospects and discussing real estate strategy.

The town’s engineering department, meanwhile, is working on plans for no fewer than six downtown road projects next year to support The Depot and “other pending development projects,” according to a council action form submitted by Engineering Director Jeff Hill.

At their Nov. 4 meeting, councilors approved spending $610,000 to engage an outside consultant to help get the projects ready for bid.

Among the plans: extending Fishers Corner Boulevard west from Lantern Road to Municipal Drive—including a new crossing over the Nickel Plate railroad tracks—widening and improving Lantern from 116th to Commercial Drive, and reconfiguring that intersection to accommodate a relocated Technology Drive and entrance to Northeast Commerce Park.

Those projects will continue regardless of the council’s decision on the food-and-beverage tax, Weingardt said, but having new sources of revenue could help the town maintain momentum over the long haul.

“This is a 10- to 20-year journey we’re talking about here,” he said. If the tax doesn’t pass, “we’ll keep moving forward, just maybe a little slower.”

Freshman Councilor Renee Cox thinks there are other ways to keep the economic development engine running, and she already has taken a public stand against the proposal.

“Taxing should not be a fiscal conservative’s solution,” she wrote in an email.

The state legislation requires that Fishers use any proceeds from the tax to lower property taxes or support economic development.

It’s not a huge sum in a town with an $81 million annual budget, but it adds up. And other communities in the northern suburbs have been collecting a 1-percent food-and-beverage tax for eight years, ever since a funding deal for the construction of Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis gave them the chance.

Suburbs that adopted the tax at the time—Carmel, Noblesville, Westfield and Zionsville—can use the money for any public purpose.

Six of the so-called doughnut counties around Indianapolis also authorized a 1-percent tax; they must split the proceeds with the Marion County Capital Improvement Board, which owns the stadium.

The fact that Fishers isn’t pioneering the idea of food-and-beverage tax in Hamilton County could make its proposal more palatable.

“Visitors will not notice it, because they’re used to it,” said Brenda Myers, executive director of the Hamilton County Convention & Visitors Bureau and a resident of Fishers.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.