IBJNews

Fishers looking to fund development with tax hike

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The clock is ticking on Fishers’ proposal to impose a 1-percent food-and-beverage tax to fund economic development in the fast-growing suburb.

State lawmakers agreed earlier this year to allow the town to collect the extra penny as it works to reinvent its uninspiring downtown, but officials must pull the trigger on the tax hike by Dec. 31.

Town Council President John Weingardt said it’s far from a done deal, even though local leaders asked the Legislature to authorize the move.

“It is important that we as a council step back and let the public tell us what they want,” he said. “We still have to represent our constituents.”
fishers_table.gif To that end, two public hearings are scheduled before the council’s December vote: Residents and business owners can share their thoughts Nov. 12 at a special meeting or Nov. 18 during a regular council confab. All correspondence and phone messages also will be shared with members.

Although raising taxes is rarely a popular idea, Fishers is embarking on an ambitious—and expensive—downtown redevelopment plan intended to spur commercial investment in the community.

The town turned over publicly owned land and agreed to pay for a parking garage at The Depot, a $42 million mixed-use project now being built along 116th Street, for example, and its redevelopment commission has been buying and bundling private property to make it more attractive to developers.

Officials also are working on several other projects expected to bring businesses (and their employees) to the town center, but no details have been made public during the talks.

“It’s a timing issue. These deals run at their own speed,” said Weingardt, who told IBJ in May that the tax-hike might be difficult to approve without “an economic development deal to hang it on.”

An announcement could come soon. The town’s Economic Development Commission and Redevelopment Commission each held executive sessions Nov. 5, justifying the closed meetings because they were negotiating with corporate prospects and discussing real estate strategy.

The town’s engineering department, meanwhile, is working on plans for no fewer than six downtown road projects next year to support The Depot and “other pending development projects,” according to a council action form submitted by Engineering Director Jeff Hill.

At their Nov. 4 meeting, councilors approved spending $610,000 to engage an outside consultant to help get the projects ready for bid.

Among the plans: extending Fishers Corner Boulevard west from Lantern Road to Municipal Drive—including a new crossing over the Nickel Plate railroad tracks—widening and improving Lantern from 116th to Commercial Drive, and reconfiguring that intersection to accommodate a relocated Technology Drive and entrance to Northeast Commerce Park.

Those projects will continue regardless of the council’s decision on the food-and-beverage tax, Weingardt said, but having new sources of revenue could help the town maintain momentum over the long haul.

“This is a 10- to 20-year journey we’re talking about here,” he said. If the tax doesn’t pass, “we’ll keep moving forward, just maybe a little slower.”

Freshman Councilor Renee Cox thinks there are other ways to keep the economic development engine running, and she already has taken a public stand against the proposal.

“Taxing should not be a fiscal conservative’s solution,” she wrote in an email.

The state legislation requires that Fishers use any proceeds from the tax to lower property taxes or support economic development.

It’s not a huge sum in a town with an $81 million annual budget, but it adds up. And other communities in the northern suburbs have been collecting a 1-percent food-and-beverage tax for eight years, ever since a funding deal for the construction of Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis gave them the chance.

Suburbs that adopted the tax at the time—Carmel, Noblesville, Westfield and Zionsville—can use the money for any public purpose.

Six of the so-called doughnut counties around Indianapolis also authorized a 1-percent tax; they must split the proceeds with the Marion County Capital Improvement Board, which owns the stadium.

The fact that Fishers isn’t pioneering the idea of food-and-beverage tax in Hamilton County could make its proposal more palatable.

“Visitors will not notice it, because they’re used to it,” said Brenda Myers, executive director of the Hamilton County Convention & Visitors Bureau and a resident of Fishers.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT