IBJNews

Former brokerage VP suing for sex, age discrimination

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A former senior vice president at a Chicago investment firm's Indianapolis office is suing the company, charging sexual and age discrimination.

Attorneys for Dana Hurst say in a Dec. 20 court filing that David A. Noyes & Co. fired her in retaliation for complaining that the company violated rights guaranteed to her in the Civil Rights Act and the Equal Pay Act.

The lawsuit, filed with the U.S. District Court of Southern Indiana in Indianapolis, describes Hurst as “female and over the age of 40.” She worked for the investment brokerage from March 1985 to November 2011. Along with being a senior vice president, she managed the company’s corporate syndicate department.

The lawsuit does not specify how much Hurst was earning or what the difference was between her pay and her male co-workers'.

Hurst's attorneys from John H. Haskin & Associates in Indianapolis claim the brokerage was taking away her work and giving it to male employees with less experience and fewer qualifications. In addition, Hurst said she didn't receive pay increases or year-end bonuses during the last 15 years at the job.

“Conversely, similarly situated male employees were routinely provided salary increases, year-end bonuses, and higher commissions when compared to [Hurst] despite these males performing substantially equal work under similar working conditions,” the lawsuit said.

Hurst complained to the company on Nov. 8, 2011, that she felt she was being treating unfairly and said she would file a formal complaint. She was fired later that day, the lawsuit states.

The filing also alleges the company allowed younger and male employees to keep their jobs despite “behavior which would warrant termination.”

Hurst’s attorneys and representatives from David A. Noyes & Co. could not be immediately reached for comment Thursday. Noyes is the 14th largest Indianapolis-area investment brokerage firm, with 34 local licensed brokers, according to IBJ records.

Hurst is seeking lost wages, unpaid bonuses, benefits, and compensation for other financial losses and attorney fees. She also requests either reinstatement or pay and benefits in lieu of returning to her former position and salary.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Seriously??
    She stayed at a company for 15 years without a raise or bonus???? May I buy a vowel (or a clue)?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT