IBJNews

Former brokerage VP suing for sex, age discrimination

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A former senior vice president at a Chicago investment firm's Indianapolis office is suing the company, charging sexual and age discrimination.

Attorneys for Dana Hurst say in a Dec. 20 court filing that David A. Noyes & Co. fired her in retaliation for complaining that the company violated rights guaranteed to her in the Civil Rights Act and the Equal Pay Act.

The lawsuit, filed with the U.S. District Court of Southern Indiana in Indianapolis, describes Hurst as “female and over the age of 40.” She worked for the investment brokerage from March 1985 to November 2011. Along with being a senior vice president, she managed the company’s corporate syndicate department.

The lawsuit does not specify how much Hurst was earning or what the difference was between her pay and her male co-workers'.

Hurst's attorneys from John H. Haskin & Associates in Indianapolis claim the brokerage was taking away her work and giving it to male employees with less experience and fewer qualifications. In addition, Hurst said she didn't receive pay increases or year-end bonuses during the last 15 years at the job.

“Conversely, similarly situated male employees were routinely provided salary increases, year-end bonuses, and higher commissions when compared to [Hurst] despite these males performing substantially equal work under similar working conditions,” the lawsuit said.

Hurst complained to the company on Nov. 8, 2011, that she felt she was being treating unfairly and said she would file a formal complaint. She was fired later that day, the lawsuit states.

The filing also alleges the company allowed younger and male employees to keep their jobs despite “behavior which would warrant termination.”

Hurst’s attorneys and representatives from David A. Noyes & Co. could not be immediately reached for comment Thursday. Noyes is the 14th largest Indianapolis-area investment brokerage firm, with 34 local licensed brokers, according to IBJ records.

Hurst is seeking lost wages, unpaid bonuses, benefits, and compensation for other financial losses and attorney fees. She also requests either reinstatement or pay and benefits in lieu of returning to her former position and salary.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Seriously??
    She stayed at a company for 15 years without a raise or bonus???? May I buy a vowel (or a clue)?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

ADVERTISEMENT