Former college running back sues NCAA over scholarship caps

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The National Collegiate Athletic Association and five of college football’s regional conferences were sued by a former West Virginia University player who claims they agreed to limit the value of scholarships to less than the actual cost of attendance.

Shawne Alston, who played running back for West Virginia, filed the lawsuit Wednesday in federal court in San Francisco, saying he took out a $5,500 loan to make up the difference between a full scholarship -- limited to tuition, academic fees, room, board and books -- and what he had to pay.

Top-tier college football is a “highly competitive marketplace” in which the value of scholarships “would rise to at least cover the full cost of attendance, and likely much more,” but for the NCAA’s limits, according to the complaint, which says the caps violate antitrust law.

Stacey Osburn, a spokeswoman for the Indianapolis-based NCAA, the governing body of major college sports, declined to comment on the lawsuit because she hadn’t reviewed the filing.

The suit follows efforts by college athletes to secure greater control over their working conditions and the use of their likenesses on television and in video games. A group of Northwestern University football players last month asked the National Labor Relations Board to recognize them as employees of the school, a step toward possible unionization.

Alston is seeking to sue on behalf of all scholarship athletes from the past four years who played football in the Pacific 12, Big Ten, Southeastern, Atlantic Coast and Big Twelve conferences. He’s asking the court to void caps on financial aid and to award damages covering the gap between the cost of attendance and scholarship awards. Such damages could be tripled under antitrust law.

In October 2011, the NCAA Division I Board of Directors approved a rule allowing conferences to provide athletes a $2,000 stipend. They suspended the rule less than two months later after complaints from more than 100 schools. It’s still under discussion, Osburn said.

Seattle-based law firm Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP and Los Angeles-based Pearson, Simon & Warshaw LLP filed the lawsuit.

Hagens Berman brought another scholarship case in 2010 against the NCAA, alleging that the organization’s limit on the number of football scholarships a Division I school can award each year violates antitrust law.

A judge dismissed the initial complaint, saying the relevant commercial market for college athlete labor was too broad. A revised complaint limited the market to football and survived a motion to dismiss. Alston’s lawsuit narrows its scope even further, to five specific conferences within top-tier college football.


  • Ungracious
    Mr. Alston is essentially complaining about a $5500.00 student loan after being given a full ride with room, board, tuition and fees. Most would call that ungracious. He was a student athlete that also received the best nutrition not Ramen noodles, free tutors, top notch healthcare access, frequent travel and NFL opportunity. He somehow thought his full ride was FREE of his own financial investment. He might possibly be unaware there were athletes and donors prior to his arrival that paved the way for his opportunity. A thank you may be more in order than a lawsuit. College athletes are becoming kiddie college brat-letes.
  • Isn't the athlete already paid?
    I am concerned that the college athletes feel they need compensated for the schools using their likeness etc. They are already compensated in the form of a college education and the scholarship they received in order to receive that education. I agree with the comment above that, perhaps, then those commitments/contracts signed by those college athletes and the universities should include a clause along the lines of if they leave or enter the pro-draft, there is a clawback of scholarship monies and compensation is paid in full by way of the coursework they now have permanent record of completing. I love college sports and there are those in my family that may not have completed college without being recruited. I, also, completely understand the level of revenue and donations to a university that can stem from the athletic programs. However, that revenue, also, could be helping curve tuition costs and other upkeep of faiclities etc. I don't know - I'm not privvy to the operating budget of a university. I will say, the athletes need to shrink their heads just a little bit - most will never play pro-sports and the education that their athletic gift is providing to them by way of low and free tuition should be received with big a "THANK YOU and I will represent this university with pride, respect, and hard work on and off the field".
  • Division I Scholarships?
    To some degree, I would hope that the players win their suit, since I suspect that if they do, there will be an exodus of many Division I schools to Division III, where student athletes are truly student athletes. If that happens, the financial challenges facing many schools will dissipate. Additionally, I would suggest that to combat the "one and done" Division I rule, that the NCAA impose a lost scholarship for each scholarship basketball player that is lost prior to his class graduating. I suspect that if this were done, schools would find themselves dis-incentivized to bring in many, if any one-and-dones.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ